Evaluating Gemini Robotics Policies in a Veo World Simulator

📅 2025-12-11
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses three key challenges in robot policy evaluation: poor generalization, insufficient safety verification, and low-fidelity simulation. We propose a generative evaluation framework grounded in the Veo video foundation model. Methodologically, it integrates action-conditioned modeling, multi-view consistent completion, and synthetic scene perturbations to enable joint assessment of bimanual manipulation policies under nominal distributions, out-of-distribution (OOD) conditions, and safety constraints. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic extension of large video models to full-spectrum robot policy evaluation—enabling physics- and semantics-aware red-teaming for safety violations and high-fidelity interactive scene editing. Evaluated across 1,600+ real-world experiments, the framework characterizes performance rankings, OOD generalization bottlenecks, and safety violation patterns for eight Gemini Robotics policies across five task categories, significantly enhancing the comprehensiveness and interpretability of policy evaluation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Generative world models hold significant potential for simulating interactions with visuomotor policies in varied environments. Frontier video models can enable generation of realistic observations and environment interactions in a scalable and general manner. However, the use of video models in robotics has been limited primarily to in-distribution evaluations, i.e., scenarios that are similar to ones used to train the policy or fine-tune the base video model. In this report, we demonstrate that video models can be used for the entire spectrum of policy evaluation use cases in robotics: from assessing nominal performance to out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, and probing physical and semantic safety. We introduce a generative evaluation system built upon a frontier video foundation model (Veo). The system is optimized to support robot action conditioning and multi-view consistency, while integrating generative image-editing and multi-view completion to synthesize realistic variations of real-world scenes along multiple axes of generalization. We demonstrate that the system preserves the base capabilities of the video model to enable accurate simulation of scenes that have been edited to include novel interaction objects, novel visual backgrounds, and novel distractor objects. This fidelity enables accurately predicting the relative performance of different policies in both nominal and OOD conditions, determining the relative impact of different axes of generalization on policy performance, and performing red teaming of policies to expose behaviors that violate physical or semantic safety constraints. We validate these capabilities through 1600+ real-world evaluations of eight Gemini Robotics policy checkpoints and five tasks for a bimanual manipulator.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating robotics policies in varied simulated environments
Assessing policy performance from nominal to out-of-distribution scenarios
Testing physical and semantic safety constraints of robot policies
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Video models enable full-spectrum robotics policy evaluation
System integrates action conditioning and multi-view consistency
Generative editing synthesizes realistic scene variations for generalization
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
G
Gemini Robotics Team
Google DeepMind
Coline Devin
Coline Devin
DeepMind
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningReinforcement Learning
Yilun Du
Yilun Du
Harvard University
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningRoboticsComputer Vision
Debidatta Dwibedi
Debidatta Dwibedi
Google Deepmind
Artificial IntelligenceComputer VisionMachine LearningReinforcement LearningImitation
Ruiqi Gao
Ruiqi Gao
PhD Student, Princeton University
Machine learningMolecular Dynamics
A
Abhishek Jindal
Google DeepMind
T
Thomas Kipf
Google DeepMind
Sean Kirmani
Sean Kirmani
Google DeepMind
Artificial IntelligenceNeural NetworksComputer VisionRobotics
Fangchen Liu
Fangchen Liu
Google DeepMind, UC Berkeley
machine learningrobotics
Anirudha Majumdar
Anirudha Majumdar
Associate Professor, Princeton University & Visiting Research Scientist, Google DeepMind
RoboticsMachine LearningMotion PlanningControl
A
Andrew Marmon
Google DeepMind
C
Carolina Parada
Google DeepMind
Y
Yulia Rubanova
Google DeepMind
Dhruv Shah
Dhruv Shah
Princeton University, Google DeepMind
Robot LearningArtificial IntelligenceRoboticsReinforcement Learning
Vikas Sindhwani
Vikas Sindhwani
Google DeepMind Robotics
AIRoboticsAI SafetyMachine LearningOptimization
Jie Tan
Jie Tan
Google DeepMind
Artificial General IntelligenceRoboticsFoundation ModelComputer GraphicsVision
F
Fei Xia
Google DeepMind
Ted Xiao
Ted Xiao
Staff Research Scientist, Google DeepMind
Deep LearningArtificial IntelligenceRoboticsReinforcement LearningControl Theory
Sherry Yang
Sherry Yang
Google DeepMind
Artificial Intelligence
W
Wenhao Yu
Google DeepMind
Allan Zhou
Allan Zhou
Google DeepMind
Machine Learning