🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses real-time whole-body collision avoidance control for safety-critical robotic systems, unifying two dominant safety paradigms: Complementary Constraints (CC) and Control Barrier Functions (CBF). We rigorously establish their theoretical equivalence—under sampled-data first-order dynamics—for both single- and multi-constraint scenarios, incorporating nonsmooth dynamical modeling and Lyapunov stability analysis. This equivalence reveals CC’s implicit barrier structure and CBF’s inherent optimization tractability, bridging robustness guarantees with efficient algorithm design across paradigms. The result provides a unified theoretical foundation for safety-critical controllers, enabling bidirectional transfer of robustness certificates and optimization algorithms between CC and CBF frameworks. Consequently, whole-body controllers achieve enhanced safety assurance, real-time feasibility, and formal verifiability.
📝 Abstract
Safety-critical whole-body robot control demands reactive methods that ensure collision avoidance in real-time. Complementarity constraints and control barrier functions (CBF) have emerged as core tools for ensuring such safety constraints, and each represents a well-developed field. Despite addressing similar problems, their connection remains largely unexplored. This paper bridges this gap by formally proving the equivalence between these two methodologies for sampled-data, first-order systems, considering both single and multiple constraint scenarios. By demonstrating this equivalence, we provide a unified perspective on these techniques. This unification has theoretical and practical implications, facilitating the cross-application of robustness guarantees and algorithmic improvements between complementarity and CBF frameworks. We discuss these synergistic benefits and motivate future work in the comparison of the methods in more general cases.