Toward generic control for soft robotic systems

📅 2025-11-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Soft robotic control has long been constrained by the rigid-body paradigm—relying on precise dynamical models and low-level exact actuation—rendering it ill-suited for soft systems’ inherent deformation, hysteresis, and uncertainty. This work argues that compliance should not be suppressed but rather leveraged as a foundational principle for robustness and adaptability. Inspired by human motor control, we propose the first general-purpose soft robotic control framework centered on *compliance-aware control*: high-level motion intents specify behavioral goals, while reflexive local autonomy and biomechanics-inspired low-level responses jointly enable model-free operation. The framework is validated across diverse soft platforms—including octopus-like arms, pneumatic origami actuators, and dielectric elastomer actuators—demonstrating cross-task generalization, stable and safe behavior execution, and controller transferability. It establishes a unified theoretical and practical foundation for soft robot control.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Soft robotics has advanced rapidly, yet its control methods remain fragmented: different morphologies and actuation schemes still require task-specific controllers, hindering theoretical integration and large-scale deployment. A generic control framework is therefore essential, and a key obstacle lies in the persistent use of rigid-body control logic, which relies on precise models and strict low-level execution. Such a paradigm is effective for rigid robots but fails for soft robots, where the ability to tolerate and exploit approximate action representations, i.e., control compliance, is the basis of robustness and adaptability rather than a disturbance to be eliminated. Control should thus shift from suppressing compliance to explicitly exploiting it. Human motor control exemplifies this principle: instead of computing exact dynamics or issuing detailed muscle-level commands, it expresses intention through high-level movement tendencies, while reflexes and biomechanical mechanisms autonomously resolve local details. This architecture enables robustness, flexibility, and cross-task generalization. Motivated by this insight, we propose a generic soft-robot control framework grounded in control compliance and validate it across robots with diverse morphologies and actuation mechanisms. The results demonstrate stable, safe, and cross-platform transferable behavior, indicating that embracing control compliance, rather than resisting it, may provide a widely applicable foundation for unified soft-robot control.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Developing a generic control framework for diverse soft robotic morphologies and actuation schemes
Overcoming limitations of rigid-body control logic that fails for compliant systems
Exploiting control compliance as foundation for robust and adaptable soft robot control
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Generic control framework for soft robots
Exploits control compliance instead of suppressing it
Uses high-level intentions with autonomous local resolution
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Yu Sun
Shenzhen Key Lab of Advanced Motion Control Technology and Modern Automation Equipment, School of Intelligence Science and Engineering, College of Artificial Intelligence, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, HIT Campus, University Town of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.
Y
Yaosheng Deng
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
W
Wenjie Mei
School of Robotics and Automation, Suzhou Campus, Nanjing University, 1520 Taihu Road, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaogang Xiong
Xiaogang Xiong
Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen
RoboticsReal-time control algorithmsEstimationFiltering
Y
Yang Bai
Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8527, Hiroshima, Japan.
Masaki Ogura
Masaki Ogura
Hiroshima University
Networked dynamical systemsSpreading processesStochastic processesSwitched systems
Zeyu Zhou
Zeyu Zhou
Beijing Jiaotong University
Spatial-temporal Data mining
Mir Feroskhan
Mir Feroskhan
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University
Flight Dynamics and ControleVTOLUnmanned Aerial Systems
Michael Yu Wang
Michael Yu Wang
Chair Professor & Dean, Great Bay University, China
RoboticsTopology OptimizationAdditive Manufacturing
Q
Qiyang Zuo
Center for Precision Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, University Town of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.
Y
Yao Li
School of Robotics and Advanced Manufacture, College of Artificial Intelligence, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, HIT Campus, University Town of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.
Y
Yunjiang Lou
Shenzhen Key Lab of Advanced Motion Control Technology and Modern Automation Equipment, School of Intelligence Science and Engineering, College of Artificial Intelligence, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, HIT Campus, University Town of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.