Trust-Aware Embodied Bayesian Persuasion for Mixed-Autonomy

📅 2025-09-18
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses trust degradation in mixed autonomy traffic—arising from strategic interactions between autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs)—by proposing a trust-aware embodied Bayesian persuasion framework. To ensure transparency and non-manipulativeness, the framework introduces two theoretical guarantees: the Trust Threshold Theorem and the Optimal Signal Magnitude Theorem. It employs physically grounded, interpretable signals—such as subtle forward nudges—in continuous action space to model human-AV communication at intersections. Extensive simulation experiments in mixed-traffic scenarios demonstrate that the approach significantly enhances human drivers’ situational caution, eliminates collisions entirely, and improves overall traffic throughput. The core contribution lies in the first integration of embodiment, interpretability, and Bayesian persuasion theory for human–AV coordination—yielding a solution that is simultaneously safe, trustworthy, and traffic-efficient.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Safe and efficient interaction between autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) is a critical challenge for future transportation systems. While game-theoretic models capture how AVs influence HVs, they often suffer from a long-term decay of influence and can be perceived as manipulative, eroding the human's trust. This can paradoxically lead to riskier human driving behavior over repeated interactions. In this paper, we address this challenge by proposing the Trust-Aware Embodied Bayesian Persuasion (TA-EBP) framework. Our work makes three key contributions: First, we apply Bayesian persuasion to model communication at traffic intersections, offering a transparent alternative to traditional game-theoretic models. Second, we introduce a trust parameter to the persuasion framework, deriving a theorem for the minimum trust level required for influence. Finally, we ground the abstract signals of Bayesian persuasion theory into a continuous, physically meaningful action space, deriving a second theorem for the optimal signal magnitude, realized as an AV's forward nudge. Additionally, we validate our framework in a mixed-autonomy traffic simulation, demonstrating that TA-EBP successfully persuades HVs to drive more cautiously, eliminating collisions and improving traffic flow compared to baselines that either ignore trust or lack communication. Our work provides a transparent and non-strategic framework for influence in human-robot interaction, enhancing both safety and efficiency.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Modeling communication between autonomous and human-driven vehicles at intersections
Addressing trust decay and manipulation in game-theoretic vehicle interactions
Translating abstract Bayesian signals into continuous physical action space
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bayesian persuasion models communication at intersections
Introduces trust parameter for minimum influence level
Grounds signals into continuous physical action space
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.