๐ค AI Summary
This study addresses the susceptibility of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to stylistic biases, such as color, which cause deviations from human cognition. We propose a novel covert visual prompting approach that systematically investigates these mechanisms by fine-tuning text color and contrast. Our experiments demonstrate that color perturbations alter latent representations within visual encoders, inducing semantic misjudgments; for instance, green positive words bias sentiment predictions, while low contrast increases error rates in Visual Question Answering. These findings reveal the intrinsic risk of visual styles dominating model interpretation. Consequently, this work provides critical empirical evidence for enhancing VLM robustness and achieving better cognitive alignment, highlighting the necessity of mitigating superficial visual cues to ensure reliable multimodal reasoning.
๐ Abstract
Vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in industrial decision-making systems, such as recruitment support and recommendation. This motivates careful analysis of how VLMs process visual and textual information. In this work, we study how VLMs interpret text rendered as an image, and investigate the influence of visual styling biases. To this end, we introduce Stealth Visual Prompts, which subtly change visual styling of text, such as color and contrast, while preserving semantic content. Using these prompts, we systematically control the visual styling of words in text and measure their impact on the analysis performed by VLMs. We further analyze how such visual perturbations affect the latent representations of the vision encoder. From our experiments, we observed that coloring positive words in green consistently shifts sentiment predictions toward a positive direction. As a result, VLMs often fail to properly account for negative words present in the text. Our analysis suggests that this behavior is correlated with changes in the latent representations of the vision encoder induced by color variations. In addition, we show that reducing text--background contrast increases reliance on visually salient cues and leads to more incorrect Visual Question Answering (VQA) outputs. These results suggest that the visual styling of rendered text can guide VLMs' interpretation in ways that diverge from human semantic understanding.
Project page: https://github.com/KohsukeIde/color-bias-vlm