PlannerForge: LLM Agents for Scenario-Based Testing of Motion Planners in Autonomous Driving

📅 2026-09-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出PlannerForge,一种LLM代理框架,用于解决自动驾驶系统场景测试流程中的模块化问题,通过统一框架覆盖从场景生成到系统评估的全过程。
📝 Abstract
Ensuring the safety of autonomous driving is a critical challenge. Scenario-based testing is a systematic process used to validate Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs), but it remains a fragmented modular pipeline in which scenario generation, retrieval, modification, ADS execution, and results analysis are performed by separate tools with little interaction. Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise across ADS sub-systems such as perception, planning, and control. However, no prior work covers the whole scenario-based testing pipeline for ADSs with a unified LLM-agent framework. We present PlannerForge, an LLM-agent framework that extends all scenario-based testing stages (from Scenario Generation to ADS Assessment) and adds two further LLM-enhanced stages: ADS Enhancement and ADS Benchmarking. We evaluate PlannerForge with 10 off-the-shelf LLMs across all tasks (Generation, Selection, Modification, Module Routing, Planner Testing, and Enhancement) under 5 prompt conditions. Best-per-task scores range from 0.88 to 1.00, and open-source 20-35B backends match commercial APIs on most tasks. Open-source models such as Qwen3.6:35B match commercial APIs on three of the five tasks. Chaining the modules end-to-end retains 83% / 78% of seed queries (commercial / open). It outperforms Scenario Factory 2.0 (Finkeldei et al., 2025) on natural-language generation (193 vs. 144 executable of 200) and realises 92-96% of requested city, road and vehicle attributes. It outperforms BM25 (Robertson and Zaragoza, 2009) at rank 1 selection (92.0% vs. 67.5%) and From-Words-to-Collisions (Gao et al., 2025) on physically valid edits (>=94% vs. 31%). At N=400, cost-tuning lifts planner success from 50.4% to 70.2% and cuts collisions from 19.0% to 8.4%, without domain-specific fine-tuning.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Autonomous Driving Systems
Scenario-based Testing
Large Language Model Agents
Safety
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LLM-agent framework
Scenario-based testing
ADS Enhancement
Benchmarking
End-to-end chaining
Y
Yuan Gao
Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany; Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI)
S
Sebastian Müller
Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany; Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI)
Mattia Piccinini
Mattia Piccinini
TUM Global Post-doc Researcher, Technical University of Munich
Autonomous VehiclesArtificial IntelligenceRoboticsTrajectory PlanningMotion Control
Marc Kaufeld
Marc Kaufeld
Research Associate at the Autonomous Systems Lab, Technical University of Munich
Autonomous DrivingMotion PlanningControl
Y
Yuchen Zhang
Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany; Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI)
F
Finn Rasmus Schäfer
Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany; Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI)
Q
Qunying Song
University College London, London, United Kingdom
Johannes Betz
Johannes Betz
Professor, Autonomous Vehicle Systems, Technical University of Munich (TUM)
Autonomous SystemsMotion PlaningControlRobots