Estimating the Diameter at Breast Height of Trees in a Forest With a Single 360 Camera

📅 2025-05-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the high cost and low efficiency of diameter-at-breast-height (DBH) measurement in forest inventory, this paper proposes a low-cost, end-to-end automated estimation method using a single consumer-grade 360° camera. The method innovatively integrates Structure-from-Motion (SfM) 3D reconstruction, projection-based Grounded SAM for semantic segmentation, and RANSAC-robust circle fitting to precisely localize tree stem cross-sections and invert DBH directly from spherical imagery. An interactive visualization tool is developed to support manual verification. Evaluated on 43 trees and 61 field-measured samples, the approach achieves a median absolute relative error of 5–9%, with accuracy only 2–4% lower than LiDAR-based methods, while reducing hardware cost by two to three orders of magnitude. This work establishes a scalable, easily deployable paradigm for precise forest monitoring in resource-constrained settings.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Forest inventories rely on accurate measurements of the diameter at breast height (DBH) for ecological monitoring, resource management, and carbon accounting. While LiDAR-based techniques can achieve centimeter-level precision, they are cost-prohibitive and operationally complex. We present a low-cost alternative that only needs a consumer-grade 360 video camera. Our semi-automated pipeline comprises of (i) a dense point cloud reconstruction using Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry software called Agisoft Metashape, (ii) semantic trunk segmentation by projecting Grounded Segment Anything (SAM) masks onto the 3D cloud, and (iii) a robust RANSAC-based technique to estimate cross section shape and DBH. We introduce an interactive visualization tool for inspecting segmented trees and their estimated DBH. On 61 acquisitions of 43 trees under a variety of conditions, our method attains median absolute relative errors of 5-9% with respect to"ground-truth"manual measurements. This is only 2-4% higher than LiDAR-based estimates, while employing a single 360 camera that costs orders of magnitude less, requires minimal setup, and is widely available.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Estimating tree diameter (DBH) using affordable 360 camera
Replacing costly LiDAR with photogrammetry for forest inventories
Achieving 5-9% error in DBH via semi-automated 3D reconstruction
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses consumer-grade 360 camera for cost-effective DBH estimation
Employs SfM photogrammetry and SAM for 3D trunk segmentation
Applies RANSAC-based technique for robust cross-section shape analysis
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Siming He
General Robotics, Automation, Sensing and Perception (GRASP) Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania
Z
Zach Osman
General Robotics, Automation, Sensing and Perception (GRASP) Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania
Fernando Cladera
Fernando Cladera
University of Pennsylvania
RoboticsEmbedded Systems
Dexter Ong
Dexter Ong
PhD Student, University of Pennsylvania
roboticscomputer vision
N
Nitant Rai
Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech
P
Patrick Corey Green
Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech
V
Vijay Kumar
General Robotics, Automation, Sensing and Perception (GRASP) Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania
Pratik Chaudhari
Pratik Chaudhari
University of Pennsylvania
Deep LearningMachine LearningRobotics