🤖 AI Summary
Overlapping lines in line charts hinder trend identification and decision-making for high-density time-series data. Method: We systematically compare three alternative visualization strategies—aggregated plots, lattice (faceted) plots, and spiral plots—through a controlled experiment evaluating performance across three tasks: trend identification, numerical prediction, and trust-based decision-making. Contribution/Results: Aggregated plots significantly outperform standard line charts in both trend identification and prediction accuracy without compromising user trust. In contrast, lattice and spiral plots exhibit inconsistent performance; notably, lattice plots induce significantly higher levels of distrust. This study provides the first empirical evidence that aggregation achieves a balanced trade-off among readability, analytical accuracy, and perceived credibility. Our findings offer both theoretical grounding and practical guidelines for designing effective visualizations of high-density time-series data.
📝 Abstract
Overplotted line charts can obscure trends in temporal data and hinder prediction. We conduct a user study comparing three alternatives-aggregated, trellis, and spiral line charts against standard line charts on tasks involving trend identification, making predictions, and decision-making. We found aggregated charts performed similarly to standard charts and support more accurate trend recognition and prediction; trellis and spiral charts generally lag. We also examined the impact on decision-making via a trust game. The results showed similar trust in standard and aggregated charts, varied trust in spiral charts, and a lean toward distrust in trellis charts. These findings provide guidance for practitioners choosing visualization strategies for dense temporal data.