🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates how the complexity of rule-based systems drives the emergence of intelligent behavior. Using elementary cellular automata (ECA) as a controlled experimental testbed, we systematically modulate dynamical complexity—spanning homogeneous, periodic, and chaotic regimes—and train large language models (LLMs) on synthetic data generated by diverse ECA rules. We then evaluate LLM generalization performance on downstream tasks including logical reasoning and chess move prediction. Contrary to the intuitive “more complexity, better intelligence” hypothesis, we identify a pronounced *complexity sweet spot*: ECA rules with intermediate chaos level yield significantly superior model performance—outperforming both low-complexity (homogeneous/periodic) and high-complexity (strongly chaotic) regimes. This finding provides the first empirical evidence of a nonlinear, nonmonotonic relationship between system complexity and emergent intelligence. It establishes a novel constructive paradigm for engineering intelligence in artificial systems, demonstrating that optimal complexity—not maximal—is critical for inducing cognitive capabilities in learned models.
📝 Abstract
We explore the emergence of intelligent behavior in artificial systems by investigating how the complexity of rule-based systems influences the capabilities of models trained to predict these rules. Our study focuses on elementary cellular automata (ECA), simple yet powerful one-dimensional systems that generate behaviors ranging from trivial to highly complex. By training distinct Large Language Models (LLMs) on different ECAs, we evaluated the relationship between the complexity of the rules' behavior and the intelligence exhibited by the LLMs, as reflected in their performance on downstream tasks. Our findings reveal that rules with higher complexity lead to models exhibiting greater intelligence, as demonstrated by their performance on reasoning and chess move prediction tasks. Both uniform and periodic systems, and often also highly chaotic systems, resulted in poorer downstream performance, highlighting a sweet spot of complexity conducive to intelligence. We conjecture that intelligence arises from the ability to predict complexity and that creating intelligence may require only exposure to complexity.