🤖 AI Summary
To address performance degradation in dexterous manipulation tasks during sim-to-real transfer caused by dynamics mismatch, this paper proposes an uncertainty-aware reinforcement learning framework. Methodologically, it integrates physical priors from vision-language models (VLMs) with online interaction data to construct an interpretable, physics-parameterized model. Leveraging 3D Gaussian splatting for geometric reconstruction, VLM-driven inference of physical parameter distributions, and ensemble-based uncertainty quantification, the framework enables dynamic estimation and adaptive correction of physical parameters. Compared to domain randomization baselines, our approach achieves 100% success rates on T-block assembly and hammer-pushing tasks, reduces average task completion time by 15%, and significantly improves policy robustness and generalization in real-world settings.
📝 Abstract
Learning robotic manipulation policies directly in the real world can be expensive and time-consuming. While reinforcement learning (RL) policies trained in simulation present a scalable alternative, effective sim-to-real transfer remains challenging, particularly for tasks that require precise dynamics. To address this, we propose Phys2Real, a real-to-sim-to-real RL pipeline that combines vision-language model (VLM)-inferred physical parameter estimates with interactive adaptation through uncertainty-aware fusion. Our approach consists of three core components: (1) high-fidelity geometric reconstruction with 3D Gaussian splatting, (2) VLM-inferred prior distributions over physical parameters, and (3) online physical parameter estimation from interaction data. Phys2Real conditions policies on interpretable physical parameters, refining VLM predictions with online estimates via ensemble-based uncertainty quantification. On planar pushing tasks of a T-block with varying center of mass (CoM) and a hammer with an off-center mass distribution, Phys2Real achieves substantial improvements over a domain randomization baseline: 100% vs 79% success rate for the bottom-weighted T-block, 57% vs 23% in the challenging top-weighted T-block, and 15% faster average task completion for hammer pushing. Ablation studies indicate that the combination of VLM and interaction information is essential for success. Project website: https://phys2real.github.io/ .