🤖 AI Summary
Multi-BFT consensus alleviates leader bottlenecks via parallel instances but incurs high confirmation latency and limited concurrency due to enforced global ordering. This paper proposes a hybrid ordering paradigm: strongly sequence-dependent transactions retain global order, while others are dynamically partitioned based on dependency graphs and executed under partial order. A lightweight escrow protocol coordinates interactions across ordering domains while guaranteeing consistency. Our approach introduces the first synergistic mechanism integrating partial and global ordering, enabling dynamic partitioning and asynchronous cross-domain coordination. In wide-area network experiments with 128 nodes, it reduces maximum confirmation latency by up to 87% compared to state-of-the-art Multi-BFT protocols, while significantly improving throughput and real-time responsiveness.
📝 Abstract
Multi-Byzantine Fault Tolerant (Multi-BFT) consensus allows multiple consensus instances to run in parallel, resolving the leader bottleneck problem inherent in classic BFT consensus. However, the global ordering of Multi-BFT consensus enforces a strict serialized sequence of transactions, imposing additional confirmation latency and also limiting concurrency. In this paper, we introduce Orthrus, a Multi-BFT protocol that accelerates transaction confirmation through partial ordering while reserving global ordering for transactions requiring stricter sequencing. To this end, Orthrus strategically partitions transactions to maximize concurrency and ensure consistency. Additionally, it incorporates an escrow mechanism to manage interactions between partially and globally ordered transactions. We evaluated Orthrus through extensive experiments in realistic settings, deploying 128 replicas in WAN and LAN environments. Our findings demonstrate latency reductions of up to 87% in WAN compared to existing Multi-BFT protocols.