Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models

📅 2025-02-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Federated Foundation Models (FedFMs) face ten fundamental challenges spanning theoretical foundations, private data utilization, continual/forgetting learning, non-IID and graph-structured data modeling, bidirectional knowledge transfer, incentive and game-theoretic mechanism design, model watermarking, and efficiency optimization. Method: We systematically categorize these challenges into five orthogonal dimensions—theory, data, heterogeneity, security & privacy, and efficiency—and provide formal objective definitions and a unified analytical framework. Integrating federated learning, knowledge distillation, graph neural networks, game theory, cryptographic watermarking, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning, we establish the first taxonomy and mathematical formalism for FedFMs. Contribution/Results: This work advances the theoretical rigor and practical deployability of FedFMs, delivering a scalable methodology and implementation roadmap for privacy-preserving, distributed large-model training.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Federated Foundation Models (FedFMs) represent a distributed learning paradigm that fuses general competences of foundation models as well as privacy-preserving capabilities of federated learning. This combination allows the large foundation models and the small local domain models at the remote clients to learn from each other in a teacher-student learning setting. This paper provides a comprehensive summary of the ten challenging problems inherent in FedFMs, encompassing foundational theory, utilization of private data, continual learning, unlearning, Non-IID and graph data, bidirectional knowledge transfer, incentive mechanism design, game mechanism design, model watermarking, and efficiency. The ten challenging problems manifest in five pivotal aspects: ``Foundational Theory,"which aims to establish a coherent and unifying theoretical framework for FedFMs. ``Data,"addressing the difficulties in leveraging domain-specific knowledge from private data while maintaining privacy; ``Heterogeneity,"examining variations in data, model, and computational resources across clients; ``Security and Privacy,"focusing on defenses against malicious attacks and model theft; and ``Efficiency,"highlighting the need for improvements in training, communication, and parameter efficiency. For each problem, we offer a clear mathematical definition on the objective function, analyze existing methods, and discuss the key challenges and potential solutions. This in-depth exploration aims to advance the theoretical foundations of FedFMs, guide practical implementations, and inspire future research to overcome these obstacles, thereby enabling the robust, efficient, and privacy-preserving FedFMs in various real-world applications.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Establishing a theoretical framework for Federated Foundation Models
Leveraging private data while ensuring privacy
Improving efficiency in training and communication
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Distributed learning paradigm
Teacher-student learning setting
Bidirectional knowledge transfer
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Tao Fan
Tao Fan
Scichuan University of Science and Engineering
Synchronization of complex networksConsensus of multi-agent systemsWireless sensor networks
Hanlin Gu
Hanlin Gu
Webank
federated learningprivacy and securityLLM
X
Xuemei Cao
Southwestern University of Finance and Economic, China
Chee Seng Chan
Chee Seng Chan
Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
Computer VisionMachine LearningImage Processing
Q
Qian Chen
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Y
Yiqiang Chen
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Yihui Feng
Yihui Feng
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
federated learning
Y
Yang Gu
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Jiaxiang Geng
Jiaxiang Geng
The University of Hong Kong, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Federated LearningFoundation ModelMobile ComputingIntegrated Sensing and Communication
B
Bing Luo
Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China
S
Shuoling Liu
Innovation Reseach Center, EFunds, China
W
W. Ong
Universti Malaya, Malaysia
C
Chao Ren
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
J
Jiaqi Shao
Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China
C
Chuan Sun
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
X
Xiaoli Tang
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
H
Hong Xi Tae
Universti Malaya, Malaysia
Y
Yongxin Tong
Beihang University, China
S
Shuyue Wei
Beihang University, China
F
Fan Wu
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
W
Wei Xi
Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
M
Mingcong Xu
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
He Yang
He Yang
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Federated LearningDeep LearningPrivacy & Security
X
Xin Yang
Southwestern University of Finance and Economic, China
Jiangpeng Yan
Jiangpeng Yan
E Fund | Tsinghua University
Artificial Intelligence
H
Hao Yu
Southwestern University of Finance and Economic, China
H
Han Yu
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
T
Teng Zhang
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Y
Yifei Zhang
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
X
Xiaojin Zhang
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Zhenzhe Zheng
Zhenzhe Zheng
Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
On-device Machine LearningGame TheoryDecision-Making
Lixin Fan
Lixin Fan
WeBank
Computer visionmachine learningartificial intelligencefederated learning
Q
Qiang Yang
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong; Chief AI Officer of WeBank, Shenzhen, China