SPARK: Skeleton-Guided Reasoning Synthesis from Large-Scale Scientific Literature

📅 2026-08-30
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
为解决高质量科学推理数据缺乏的问题,提出SPARK框架,通过提取论文的论证结构生成多样化推理任务,构建了更具挑战性的科学推理数据集Spark-234K。
📝 Abstract
Scientific reasoning remains challenging for open-source models, largely due to the lack of high-quality scientific reasoning data. Existing datasets are often dominated by factual recall or formulaic problem solving, with limited emphasis on mechanism understanding, evidence-grounded reasoning, and hypothesis evaluation. To address this, we introduce SPARK (Scientific Paper Abstracted Reasoning sKeleton), a paper-oriented synthesis framework built on Sci-Base, a large-scale corpus of research papers spanning 10 scientific disciplines. Instead of directly converting papers into question-answer pairs, SPARK treats the claim-evidence-derivation structure of a paper as the fundamental unit of reasoning synthesis. Specifically, SPARK (1) distills each paper into a compact reasoning skeleton capturing its central claims and supporting evidence, enabling self-contained question generation, and (2) synthesizes reasoning tasks from four scientific perspectives: mechanistic reasoning, hypothesis falsification, quantitative derivation, and boundary calibration. A final consistency verification stage further removes unsupported or contradictory outputs. Using this framework, we construct Spark-234K, a scientific reasoning dataset with substantially higher difficulty and diversity than existing resources. Experiments show that Spark-234K consistently outperforms existing scientific reasoning datasets while achieving stronger performance with significantly fewer training samples.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

scientific reasoning
high-quality data
mechanism understanding
evidence-grounded reasoning
hypothesis evaluation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

reasoning synthesis
claim-evidence-derivation structure
mechanistic reasoning
hypothesis falsification