Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: A Real-Time Motion Planning Algorithm on Embedded Hardware

📅 2026-01-07
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current autonomous driving systems lack mechanisms to actively ensure safe operation when the primary planner fails, making it difficult to simultaneously meet functional safety and real-time requirements. This work proposes a fail-operational active safety extension architecture that, for the first time, integrates a lightweight sampling-based trajectory planner into a certifiable safety framework and implements it on automotive-grade embedded hardware using a real-time operating system. The approach enables deterministic real-time computation under stringent resource constraints. Experimental results demonstrate that the system exhibits bounded latency and extremely low timing jitter, thereby validating the feasibility of performing real-time emergency trajectory planning on a safety-certifiable platform.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Ensuring the functional safety of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) requires motion planning modules that not only operate within strict real-time constraints but also maintain controllability in case of system faults. Existing safeguarding concepts, such as Online Verification (OV), provide safety layers that detect infeasible planning outputs. However, they lack an active mechanism to ensure safe operation in the event that the main planner fails. This paper presents a first step toward an active safety extension for fail-operational Autonomous Driving (AD). We deploy a lightweight sampling-based trajectory planner on an automotive-grade, embedded platform running a Real-Time Operating System (RTOS). The planner continuously computes trajectories under constrained computational resources, forming the foundation for future emergency planning architectures. Experimental results demonstrate deterministic timing behavior with bounded latency and minimal jitter, validating the feasibility of trajectory planning on safety-certifiable hardware. The study highlights both the potential and the remaining challenges of integrating active fallback mechanisms as an integral part of next-generation safeguarding frameworks. The code is available at: https://github.com/TUM-AVS/real-time-motion-planning
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Autonomous Driving
Motion Planning
Fail-operational
Real-Time
Functional Safety
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

real-time motion planning
fail-operational autonomy
embedded safety-critical systems
sampling-based trajectory planner
active fallback mechanism
🔎 Similar Papers
Korbinian Moller
Korbinian Moller
Research Associate at the Autonomous Vehicle Systems Lab, Technical University of Munich
Autonomous Driving
G
Glenn Johannes Tungka
Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany; Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI)
L
Lucas Jurgens
Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany; Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI)
Johannes Betz
Johannes Betz
Professor, Autonomous Vehicle Systems, Technical University of Munich (TUM)
Autonomous SystemsMotion PlaningControlRobots