Where Treewidth and Pathwidth Diverge: Towards a Uniform Kernel for Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion

📅 2026-08-10
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the long-standing open question of whether the Pathwidth-η Deletion problem admits a polynomial kernel independent of η—a question that has received little attention despite the perceived similarity between treewidth and pathwidth. By integrating techniques from parameterized complexity, graph decomposition, and kernelization, the paper establishes—for the first time—the existence of uniform polynomial kernels under three distinct structural parameterizations, including vertex cover number and distance to treedepth. These results challenge the conventional intuition that treewidth and pathwidth exhibit analogous behavior in kernelization contexts. Moreover, the study conjectures that a uniform kernel also exists when parameterized solely by the solution size k, opening a new direction for future research.
📝 Abstract
For a constant $η\geq 0$, Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion is the problem of deciding whether, for a given graph $G$ and integer $k$, there is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that the pathwidth of $G - S$ is at most $η$. The problems Treewidth-$η$ Deletion and Treedepth-$η$ Deletion are defined similarly for the parameters treewidth and treedepth, respectively. A landmark result of Fomin et al. [FOCS, 2012] shows that, for any constant $η$, all three problems admit a kernel on $O(k^{c(η)})$ vertices, where $c(η)$ is a constant depending on $η$. Giannopoulou et al. [ACM TALG, 2017] show that, in some sense, this result is optimal for Treewidth-$η$ Deletion: for $η\geq 2$ and even when parameterizing by the size of a vertex cover $M$ of the input graph, there is no kernel of size $O(|M|^{\frac{η+1}{2}-\varepsilon})$, for any $\varepsilon > 0$. Contrasting this result, they prove that Treedepth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform polynomial kernel, that is, a kernel of size $O(k^c)$ for a constant $c$ that is independent of $η$. In comparison, the question whether Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform polynomial kernel has been neglected in the literature. As treewidth and pathwidth tend to behave similarly, it is natural to expect that no uniform kernel exists when parameterizing by the size of a vertex cover. Surprisingly, we show this not to be the case. More concretely, we prove the existence of a uniform polynomial kernel for Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion when parameterizing by (1) the solution size $k$ plus the size of a set $M$ such that $G - M$ has bounded treedepth; (2) the (vertex-deletion) distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs; (3) the distance to the class of graphs with treedepth at most $η+ 1$. This leads us to conjecture that Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform kernel when parameterizing by the solution size $k$.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Pathwidth
Deletion
Uniform Kernel
Parameterized Complexity
Graph Modification
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

uniform kernel
pathwidth deletion
parameterized complexity
polynomial kernel
graph modification
A
Ahmed Ghazy
CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany; Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
J
Jakob Greilhuber
CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany; Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
T
Tim A. Hartmann
CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany
Roohani Sharma
Roohani Sharma
Max Planck Institute for Informatics
parameterized complexitygraph theorygraph algorithmsstructural graph theory