🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge in open-ended reinforcement learning where large language models struggle to simultaneously satisfy multiple scoring criteria, and conventional scalar rewards obscure fine-grained feedback, thereby impeding targeted improvement of performance bottlenecks. The authors propose a criterion-aware selective exploration mechanism that identifies persistently underperforming dimensions and guides the generation of high-quality trajectories. Only samples surpassing the natural policy’s average overall score are retained, and their weakly supported behaviors are reinforced through re-evaluation with the original prompts. An auxiliary optimization objective is further introduced to dynamically modulate the guidance signal. Evaluated on both 4B and 14B models, this approach achieves state-of-the-art average scores across all benchmarks, yielding a 3.3-point average gain over standard Rubric-RL for the 14B model—with up to 6.0 points in creative writing—while enhancing output diversity and delivering significant improvements on objective tasks in domains such as medicine and science.
📝 Abstract
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) for open-ended tasks is challenging because responses must satisfy multidimensional criteria without following a single correct generation trajectory. Existing rubric-based reinforcement learning (RL) methods compress fine-grained criterion-level feedback into scalar rewards, making persistent capability gaps difficult to target under limited on-policy exploration. We propose $\textbf{RISE-RL}$ (Rubric-Informed Selective Exploration), which uses repeatedly missed rubric criteria to elicit privileged trajectories that are difficult to discover through unguided exploration alone. RISE-RL retains only trajectories whose complete-rubric reward exceeds the mean reward of natural rollouts, and then re-evaluates them under the original prompt to emphasize behaviors that remain weakly supported by the natural policy. The resulting guidance signal is optimized through a separate auxiliary objective and removed once its additional benefit diminishes. Experiments with 4B and 14B models across writing, chat, health, and science show that RISE-RL achieves the highest mean score on every evaluated benchmark under guidance-free evaluation. Compared with standard Rubric-RL, it improves the average score by 1.3 points at the 4B scale and $\textbf{3.3 points at the 14B scale}$, including a $\textbf{6.0-point}$ gain on CreativeWriting-V3. It also improves creative-writing diversity and yields gains on objectively scored medical and scientific benchmarks. These results indicate that selective internalization through reward filtering and policy support shaping is effective for open-ended reinforcement learning.