🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses online optimization problems—both with and without predictions—by establishing the first systematic computational complexity theory framework. Method: Focusing on minimization problems under binary predictions, it introduces an error-measure-driven hierarchy of complexity classes grounded in the canonical hard problem of string guessing; it defines novel error-sensitive reductions, completeness, and hardness notions, and employs information-theoretic analysis, generalized oracle models, and formal online algorithm modeling. Contribution/Results: The paper constructs the first scalable, prediction-augmented complexity hierarchy; proves completeness of classical problems—including paging—within each level of the hierarchy; and uniformly extends known lower bounds across the entire class family. Crucially, it reveals a universal relationship between prediction error magnitude and lower bounds for online problems, thereby unifying and generalizing prior hardness results in the context of predictive assistance.
📝 Abstract
With the developments in machine learning, there has been a surge in interest and results focused on algorithms utilizing predictions, not least in online algorithms where most new results incorporate the prediction aspect for concrete online problems. While the structural computational hardness of problems with regards to time and space is quite well developed, not much is known about online problems where time and space resources are typically not in focus. Some information-theoretical insights were gained when researchers considered online algorithms with oracle advice, but predictions of uncertain quality is a very different matter. We initiate the development of a complexity theory for online problems with predictions, focusing on binary predictions for minimization problems. Based on the most generic hard online problem type, string guessing, we define a family of hierarchies of complexity classes (indexed by pairs of error measures) and develop notions of reductions, class membership, hardness, and completeness. Our framework contains all the tools one expects to find when working with complexity, and we illustrate our tools by analyzing problems with different characteristics. In addition, we show that known lower bounds for paging with predictions apply directly to all hard problems for each class in the hierarchy based on the canonical pair of error measures. Our work also implies corresponding complexity classes for classic online problems without predictions, with the corresponding complete problems.