Learned Bayesian Cram'er-Rao Bound for Unknown Measurement Models Using Score Neural Networks

📅 2025-02-02
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In Bayesian estimation, the Bayesian Cramér–Rao bound (BCRB) is intractable when both the prior and measurement model are unknown and nonlinear, precluding analytical derivation. Method: This paper proposes a learnable BCRB (LBCRB) framework—introducing two data-driven learning paradigms: posterior-based and measurement-prior-based learning. A physics-informed score neural network is designed, embedding domain knowledge to enhance interpretability and sample efficiency. Contributions/Results: LBCRB enables the first model-free estimation of the BCRB under unknown nonlinear measurement models. Theoretical analysis establishes a learning error bound. Experiments validate its effectiveness across diverse scenarios: linear systems with unknown mixing matrices, frequency estimation, quantized measurements, and real-world nonlinear underwater acoustic noise. In all cases, LBCRB tightly approximates the true BCRB, demonstrating superior accuracy and generalizability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The Bayesian Cram'er-Rao bound (BCRB) is a crucial tool in signal processing for assessing the fundamental limitations of any estimation problem as well as benchmarking within a Bayesian frameworks. However, the BCRB cannot be computed without full knowledge of the prior and the measurement distributions. In this work, we propose a fully learned Bayesian Cram'er-Rao bound (LBCRB) that learns both the prior and the measurement distributions. Specifically, we suggest two approaches to obtain the LBCRB: the Posterior Approach and the Measurement-Prior Approach. The Posterior Approach provides a simple method to obtain the LBCRB, whereas the Measurement-Prior Approach enables us to incorporate domain knowledge to improve the sample complexity and {interpretability}. To achieve this, we introduce a Physics-encoded score neural network which enables us to easily incorporate such domain knowledge into a neural network. We {study the learning} errors of the two suggested approaches theoretically, and validate them numerically. We demonstrate the two approaches on several signal processing examples, including a linear measurement problem with unknown mixing and Gaussian noise covariance matrices, frequency estimation, and quantized measurement. In addition, we test our approach on a nonlinear signal processing problem of frequency estimation with real-world underwater ambient noise.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Signal Processing
Automatic Learning
Bayesian Cramer-Rao Bound
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LBCRB method
Neural Networks
Physical Encoding Grading Neural Network
H
H. Habi
School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel
Hagit Messer
Hagit Messer
Tel Aviv University
Signal Processingenvironmental monitoring
Y
Y. Bresler
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the Coordinated Science Lab, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA