A Survey on Computational Pathology Foundation Models: Datasets, Adaptation Strategies, and Evaluation Tasks

📅 2025-01-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses three core challenges confronting computational pathology foundation models (CPathFMs) in whole-slide image analysis: data scarcity and heterogeneity, weak domain adaptability, and the absence of standardized evaluation protocols. Methodologically, it introduces a novel unimodal/multimodal dichotomy for systematic CPathFM taxonomy; establishes a three-dimensional analytical framework encompassing data curation, domain adaptation, and task-specific evaluation; and designs a pathology-aware evaluation protocol integrating contrastive learning, multimodal fusion, self-supervised pretraining, and transfer adaptation. The study bridges critical gaps in cross-institutional model adaptation and benchmark standardization, delivering the first comprehensive CPathFM technology landscape, a reusable benchmarking framework, and a clinical AI deployment guideline—thereby advancing both methodological rigor and translational readiness in computational pathology.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Computational pathology foundation models (CPathFMs) have emerged as a powerful approach for analyzing histopathological data, leveraging self-supervised learning to extract robust feature representations from unlabeled whole-slide images. These models, categorized into uni-modal and multi-modal frameworks, have demonstrated promise in automating complex pathology tasks such as segmentation, classification, and biomarker discovery. However, the development of CPathFMs presents significant challenges, such as limited data accessibility, high variability across datasets, the necessity for domain-specific adaptation, and the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks. This survey provides a comprehensive review of CPathFMs in computational pathology, focusing on datasets, adaptation strategies, and evaluation tasks. We analyze key techniques, such as contrastive learning and multi-modal integration, and highlight existing gaps in current research. Finally, we explore future directions from four perspectives for advancing CPathFMs. This survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and AI practitioners, guiding the advancement of CPathFMs toward robust and clinically applicable AI-driven pathology solutions.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Computational Pathology
Disease Identification
Automated Diagnosis
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

CPathFMs
Contrastive Learning
Multi-modal Integration
🔎 Similar Papers
D
Dong Li
Department of Computer Science, Baylor University, TX, USA
Guihong Wan
Guihong Wan
Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Massachusetts General Hospital
AI in MedicineCombinatorial SearchMachine LearningSpatial Biology
Xintao Wu
Xintao Wu
University of Arkansas
Data MiningPrivacy and SecurityTrustworthy AIAI4Science
X
Xinyu Wu
Department of Computer Science, Baylor University, TX, USA
A
Ajit J. Nirmal
Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA; Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA
C
Christine G. Lian
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA; Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA
Peter K. Sorger
Peter K. Sorger
Harvard Medical School
Systems BiologyCancerPharmacology
Yevgeniy R. Semenov
Yevgeniy R. Semenov
Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA; Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA
C
Chen Zhao
Department of Computer Science, Baylor University, TX, USA