LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks

📅 2026-03-20
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing benchmarks for large language model (LLM) agents struggle to simultaneously preserve the fidelity of real-world task distributions and execution semantics, often inadequately addressing practical challenges such as cross-service dependencies, state contamination, and implicit user intents. To bridge this gap, this work proposes LiveClawBench, a novel evaluation framework that enforces dual fidelity through a three-dimensional complexity model encompassing task structure, service interaction, and state evolution. The benchmark features 134 executable tasks across 10 domains and 22 simulated services, implemented within a full-stack, stateful, and reproducible execution environment. LiveClawBench provides an open-source dataset, a public leaderboard, and detailed trajectory logs, enabling controlled, fine-grained, and scalable assessment of LLM agents in realistic digital assistant scenarios.
📝 Abstract
LLM-based agents are increasingly expected to handle real-world assistant tasks, yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate them under isolated sources of difficulty, such as a single environment or fully specified instructions. This leaves a substantial gap between current evaluation settings and the compositional challenges that arise in practical deployment. To address this gap, we introduce LiveClawBench, a benchmark to evaluate LLM agents on real-world assistant tasks. Based on an analysis of various real OpenClaw usage cases, we derive a Triple-Axis Complexity Framework that characterizes task difficulty along three dimensions: Environment Complexity, Cognitive Demand, and Runtime Adaptability. Guided by this framework, we construct a pilot benchmark with explicit complexity-factor annotations, covering real-world assistant tasks with compositional difficulty. Together, the framework and benchmark provide a principled foundation for evaluating LLM agents in realistic assistant settings, and establish a basis for future expansion across task domains and complexity axes. We are continuing to enrich our case collections to achieve more comprehensive domain and complexity coverage. The project page is at https://github.com/Mosi-AI/LiveClawBench.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

LLM agents
benchmarking
real-world tasks
execution fidelity
stateful environments
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LiveClawBench
LLM agents
fidelity benchmarking
stateful execution
mock applications
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
X
Xiang Long
Samsung Research, Beijing, China
L
Li Du
Samsung Research, Beijing, China
Y
Yilong Xu
Samsung Research, Beijing, China; HKUST (Guangzhou)
R
RongJian Xu
City University of Hong Kong
Q
Qiyanhui Lu
City University of Hong Kong
Ying Gao
Ying Gao
Shell, Imperial College London
Pore scale imagingReservoir engineeringMultiphase flow in porous mediaX-ray imaging
Q
Qinhua Xie
City University of Hong Kong
Fangcheng Liu
Fangcheng Liu
Huawei Noah's Ark Lab, Peking University
LLMsGenerative AIAdversarials
N
Ning Ding
Samsung Research, Beijing, China
Haoqing Wang
Haoqing Wang
PhD student, Peking University
self-supervised pre-training
Ziheng Li
Ziheng Li
Peking University
Machine LearningNatural Language Processing
C
Changjiang Zhou
Samsung Research, Beijing, China
Jianyuan Guo
Jianyuan Guo
City University of Hong Kong (CityU)
Yehui Tang
Yehui Tang
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Machine LearningQuantum AI & AI4Science