🤖 AI Summary
Current uncertainty visualization practices uncritically rely on error bars, inheriting a statistico-metaphysical framework that narrows the ontological scope of uncertainty and neglects the epistemic diversity of heterogeneous audiences. Method: Drawing on religious thought as a critical resource, the study employs conceptual analysis, critical design thinking, and cross-disciplinary metaphor construction to deconstruct the hegemony of probabilistic formalism and expose the cultural and hermeneutic heterogeneity of uncertainty representation across belief systems. Contribution/Results: It advances a non-statistocentric conception of uncertainty; proposes an ethical visualization paradigm oriented toward pluralistic stakeholders—not solely expert statisticians; and pioneers a humanistic, cognitively inclusive visualization framework that integrates philosophical depth with cultural responsiveness. Collectively, this work charts a novel trajectory for uncertainty visualization—one that is both philosophically grounded and culturally pluralistic.
📝 Abstract
In this provocation, we suggest that much (although not all) current uncertainty visualization simplifies the myriad forms of uncertainty into error bars around an estimate. This apparent simplification into error bars comes only as a result of a vast metaphysics around uncertainty and probability underlying modern statistics. We use examples from religion to present alternative views of uncertainty (metaphysical or otherwise) with the goal of enriching our conception of what kind of uncertainties we ought to visualize, and what kinds of people we might be visualizing those uncertainties for.