OmniLayout: A Schematic-Coupled Multimodal Benchmark for Constraint-Aware Geometric Reasoning in PCB Layout

2026-07-03

AI Summary

This work addresses the challenge that existing large language models struggle to simultaneously satisfy stringent geometric, routing, and electrical connectivity constraints in dense PCB layout design. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniLayout, the first multimodal benchmark specifically tailored for PCB layout, which jointly models schematic diagrams and physical layouts. The benchmark encompasses four constraint-aware reasoning tasks designed to systematically evaluate model capabilities in geometric reasoning, routability, preservation of electrical functionality, and tool invocation. Integrating industrial-scale layout data, geometric constraint modeling, routing analysis, and circuit verification, our framework exposes critical limitations of current models—particularly their weak geometric reasoning, poor routing optimization, and insufficient functional consistency—thereby filling a crucial void in evaluating multimodal collaborative reasoning within electronic design automation.

Abstract

Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in 3D spatial reasoning, spatial grounding, and fine-grained geometric understanding. However, their ability to reason about densely packed object placement under strict spatial and functional constraints remains largely unexplored, despite being a fundamental challenge in practical electronic design automation (EDA) workflows. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniLayout, the first benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on printed-circuit-board (PCB) layout placement reasoning under real-world geometric, routing, and connectivity constraints. OmniLayout contains 1,681 industrial-grade schematic-coupled PCB layouts and includes four tasks: (1) geometric reasoning for IC physical placement, with 77.24K placement instances constrained within PCB board boundaries; (2) routability-aware placement reasoning, generating physically valid component placements; (3) electrical functionality, preserving schematic-specified connectivity and electronic functional correctness; and (4) tool-augmented agentic reasoning for invoking external tools to accomplish tasks (1)-(3). Our results reveal substantial limitations of current LLMs in PCB layout placement, including weak geometric reasoning, poor routability optimization, and inconsistent preservation of electrical functionality.

Problem

• PCB layout
• geometric reasoning
• spatial constraints
• functional constraints
• electronic design automation

Innovation

• PCB layout
• geometric reasoning
• schematic-coupled
• constraint-aware
• multimodal benchmark