🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenges of efficiency, scalability, and consistency in distributed management of KV caches for large language model (LLM) services. It proposes the first four-dimensional taxonomy—spanning locality, lifetime, ownership, and storage substrate—to systematically analyze over 30 existing studies, identifying five architectural paradigms: local paging, decoupled pipelining, shared storage, memory pooling, and hybrid hierarchical designs. The study reveals that “ownership” is a key differentiator in distributed KV cache architectures and highlights the absence of seven KV-specific metrics in current evaluation methodologies. Furthermore, it connects these gaps to six critical open problems, including fault tolerance, isolation, hierarchical eviction, and speculative decoding.
📝 Abstract
The key-value (KV) cache has become a first-order memory object in LLM serving rather than a temporary per-request tensor. This survey classifies more than thirty KV-management systems and frameworks using four axes: locality, lifetime, ownership, and substrate. The axes reveal five architectural archetypes -- local-paged, disaggregated-pipeline, shared-store, memory-pool, and hybrid-tier. Once workload and hardware are fixed, ownership accounts for much of the remaining design variance among distributed systems. The survey also audits current evaluations and identifies seven missing KV-specific measurements, linking them to open problems in fault tolerance, isolation, tiered eviction, speculative decoding, MoE serving, and shared-cache semantics.