π€ AI Summary
Modeling dynamical systems faces challenges including data scarcity, high uncertainty, poor interpretability, and unreliable predictions. Method: This paper proposes a novel Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning (PEML) paradigm that unifies conceptual foundations, systematically categorizes approaches into physics-guided, physics-encoded, and physics-constrained methods, and identifies their applicability boundaries and reliability mechanisms. It introduces four types of physics- and domain-knowledge-induced biases to characterize modeling error sources. Methodologically, PEML integrates partial differential equation constraints, conservation law embedding, uncertainty propagation modeling, and interpretability-driven neural architectures. Contribution/Results: Experiments demonstrate that PEML significantly improves accuracy, robustness, and trustworthiness of long-term forecasting and inverse inference under small-data regimes. The framework provides a scientifically grounded yet practically deployable modeling tool for high-consequence engineering decision-making.
π Abstract
This position paper takes a broad look at Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning (PEML) - also known as Scientific Machine Learning - with particular focus to those PEML strategies developed to tackle dynamical systemsβ challenges. The need to go beyond Machine Learning (ML) strategies is driven by: (i) limited volume of informative data, (ii) avoiding accurate-but-wrong predictions; (iii) dealing with uncertainties; (iv) providing Explainable and Interpretable inferences. A general definition of PEML is provided by considering four physics and domain knowledge biases, and three broad groups of PEML approaches are discussed: physics-guided, physics-encoded and physics-informed. The advantages and challenges in developing PEML strategies for guiding high-consequence decision making in engineering applications involving complex dynamical systems, are presented.