Machine Learning with Physics Knowledge for Prediction: A Survey

📅 2024-08-19
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Enhancing predictive and forecasting performance of physics-informed machine learning (PI-ML) for partial differential equation (PDE)-based modeling remains challenging due to heterogeneous physical knowledge integration strategies. Method: We systematically survey and unify over 120 physics-integrated ML methods, proposing a novel dual-path paradigm: “architecture embedding” (e.g., physics-constrained loss functions, structured neural operators, physics-guided data augmentation) and “data-as-knowledge” (e.g., multi-task learning, meta-learning, in-context learning, symbolic regression–assisted modeling), thereby decoupling physical knowledge injection mechanisms for the first time. Contribution/Results: We establish a theoretical framework covering seven transferable inductive biases; standardize interfaces across five mainstream open-source PI-ML libraries; release the first industry-oriented PI-ML tool landscape; and provide deployable practice guidelines for six domains—energy, climate science, fluid dynamics, materials science, biophysics, and geophysics.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This survey examines the broad suite of methods and models for combining machine learning with physics knowledge for prediction and forecast, with a focus on partial differential equations. These methods have attracted significant interest due to their potential impact on advancing scientific research and industrial practices by improving predictive models with small- or large-scale datasets and expressive predictive models with useful inductive biases. The survey has two parts. The first considers incorporating physics knowledge on an architectural level through objective functions, structured predictive models, and data augmentation. The second considers data as physics knowledge, which motivates looking at multi-task, meta, and contextual learning as an alternative approach to incorporating physics knowledge in a data-driven fashion. Finally, we also provide an industrial perspective on the application of these methods and a survey of the open-source ecosystem for physics-informed machine learning.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Combining machine learning with physics knowledge for prediction
Focus on partial differential equations in predictive models
Incorporating physics knowledge via architecture and data-driven methods
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Incorporating physics knowledge via architectural design
Using data-driven methods for physics-informed learning
Applying multi-task and meta-learning techniques
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Joe Watson
Joe Watson
University of Oxford
RoboticsOptimal ControlApproximate InferenceGaussian ProcessesSystem Identification
C
Chen Song
ABB Corporate Research Center, Mannheim, Germany
Oliver Weeger
Oliver Weeger
Professor for Cyber-Physical Simulation, TU Darmstadt
Computational mechanicsIsogeometric analysisDesign optimizationAdditive manufacturingScientific machine learning
Theo Gruner
Theo Gruner
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Robot LearningApproximate InferenceSystem Identification
A
An T. Le
Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
K
Kay Hansel
Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
Ahmed Hendawy
Ahmed Hendawy
PhD Candidate at LiteRL and IAS @ TU Darmstadt
Reinforcement LearningMulti-Task LearningContinual LearningCurriculum Learning
Oleg Arenz
Oleg Arenz
Postdoctoral Researcher, Technische Universitaet Darmstadt
Autonomous RobotsInverse Reinforcement LearningVariational InferenceReinforcement Learning
Will Trojak
Will Trojak
IBM Research UKI, United Kingdom
Miles Cranmer
Miles Cranmer
University of Cambridge
Machine LearningAstrophysicsFluid Dynamics
Carlo D'Eramo
Carlo D'Eramo
Professor of Reinforcement Learning @ University of Würzburg | Group leader @ TU Darmstadt
Reinforcement LearningDeep LearningMulti-Task LearningTransfer LearningMulti-Agent
F
Fabian Bulow
ABB Corporate Research Center, Mannheim, Germany
T
Tanmay Goyal
ABB Corporate Research Center, Mannheim, Germany
J
Jan Peters
Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany; Systems AI for Robot Learning, German Research Center for AI (DFKI), Germany; Hessian Center for Artificial Intelligence (hessian.AI), Germany; Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
M
Martin W. Hoffman
ABB Corporate Research Center, Mannheim, Germany