Benchmarking Empirical and Learning-Based Approaches for Feedforward Steering Control in Autonomous Racing

📅 2026-05-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

217K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of improving path-tracking accuracy and lap time in autonomous racing by effectively predicting inverse lateral vehicle dynamics to minimize steering corrections from the feedback controller. The authors propose a novel empirical feedforward method—Empirical Handling Dynamics (EHD)—based on polynomial surface fitting, which captures speed-dependent nonlinear steering characteristics with minimal parametrization. Using a high-fidelity two-track vehicle dynamics simulator, they systematically evaluate two learning-based and two empirical feedforward controllers within a combined open-loop and closed-loop validation framework. Results show that although learning-based approaches achieve the lowest open-loop prediction error, the proposed EHD method delivers superior closed-loop robustness and faster lap times, underscoring the critical importance of evaluating feedforward strategies within the full control stack rather than in isolation.
📝 Abstract
Feedforward steering control is a key component of hierarchical control architectures for autonomous racing. The goal is to reduce steering corrections from the feedback controllers by predicting the vehicle's inverse lateral dynamics. This paper presents a systematic benchmark of two learning-based and two empirical (analytical) feedforward steering controllers. We introduce a new \acf{ehd} formulation based on a polynomial surface fit that captures velocity-dependent nonlinear steering behavior with minimal parametrization. We test the feedforward controllers in a high-fidelity simulation framework based on the real-world Abu Dhabi Autonomous Racing League competition, using a high-fidelity double-track vehicle dynamics simulator. Open-loop evaluation shows that the learning-based controllers achieve the lowest prediction errors; however, closed-loop testing reveals that this improved accuracy does not translate into superior path tracking performance or lap times, even after iterative fine-tuning. In contrast, the proposed EHD approach achieves the best overall closed-loop robustness and lap time, highlighting the necessity of evaluating feedforward strategies within the complete trajectory planning and control software stack. Our code is available at https://github.com/TUMRT/steering_ff_control.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

feedforward steering control
autonomous racing
learning-based control
empirical modeling
trajectory tracking
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

feedforward steering control
empirical modeling
polynomial surface fit
autonomous racing
closed-loop evaluation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
G
Georg Jank
Chair of Automatic Control, Department of Engineering Physics and Computation, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
Mattia Piccinini
Mattia Piccinini
TUM Global Post-doc Researcher, Technical University of Munich
Autonomous VehiclesArtificial IntelligenceRoboticsTrajectory PlanningMotion Control
S
Sebastian Wenk
Chair of Automatic Control, Department of Engineering Physics and Computation, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
P
Phillip Pitschi
Chair of Automatic Control, Department of Engineering Physics and Computation, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
Johannes Betz
Johannes Betz
Professor, Autonomous Vehicle Systems, Technical University of Munich (TUM)
Autonomous SystemsMotion PlaningControlRobots
B
Boris Lohmann
Chair of Automatic Control, Department of Engineering Physics and Computation, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany