🤖 AI Summary
Current LLM-based teaching agents (e.g., ChatGPT) lack grounding in learning science theories, limiting their pedagogical efficacy in STEM+C classrooms. Method: This study proposes the first adaptive scaffolding framework integrating Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) and Social Cognitive Theory to enable theory-driven, personalized instructional interactions and formative assessment. Cognitive principles are deeply embedded into the LLM agent’s architecture to establish an interpretable, verifiable human–AI collaborative intelligence mechanism—implemented as the Inquizzitor system. Contributions/Results: (1) It establishes a theoretical anchor for LLM applications in education; (2) it enables dynamic, learning-science-aligned scaffolding and feedback; and (3) empirical evaluation demonstrates significant improvements in instructional interaction quality and student experience, with strong endorsement from frontline educators.
📝 Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) present new opportunities for creating pedagogical agents that engage in meaningful dialogue to support student learning. However, the current use of LLM systems like ChatGPT in classrooms often lacks the solid theoretical foundation found in earlier intelligent tutoring systems. To bridge this gap, we propose a framework that combines Evidence-Centered Design with Social Cognitive Theory for adaptive scaffolding in LLM-based agents focused on STEM+C learning. We illustrate this framework with Inquizzitor, an LLM-based formative assessment agent that integrates human-AI hybrid intelligence and provides feedback grounded in cognitive science principles. Our findings show that Inquizzitor delivers high-quality assessment and interaction aligned with core learning theories, offering teachers effective guidance that students value. This research underscores the potential for theory-driven LLM integration in education, highlighting the ability of these systems to provide adaptive and principled instruction.