Learning Nonlinear Causal Reductions to Explain Reinforcement Learning Policies

📅 2025-07-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of explaining reinforcement learning policies through causal attribution of success and failure. To tackle the difficulty of attributing causality in high-dimensional, nonlinear agent–environment interactions, we propose the first intervention-consistent nonlinear causal model reduction framework. It stimulates causal responses among states, actions, and rewards via randomized action perturbations, then jointly applies nonlinear dimensionality reduction and causal structure learning to automatically extract high-level behavioral patterns with explicit causal semantics from raw trajectories. We theoretically prove that, under generalized additive models, this framework admits a unique exact solution. Evaluated on benchmark tasks—including cart-pole control and robotic table tennis—the method successfully identifies policy biases, critical decision bottlenecks, and failure mechanisms, outperforming existing black-box explanation approaches by a significant margin.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Why do reinforcement learning (RL) policies fail or succeed? This is a challenging question due to the complex, high-dimensional nature of agent-environment interactions. In this work, we take a causal perspective on explaining the behavior of RL policies by viewing the states, actions, and rewards as variables in a low-level causal model. We introduce random perturbations to policy actions during execution and observe their effects on the cumulative reward, learning a simplified high-level causal model that explains these relationships. To this end, we develop a nonlinear Causal Model Reduction framework that ensures approximate interventional consistency, meaning the simplified high-level model responds to interventions in a similar way as the original complex system. We prove that for a class of nonlinear causal models, there exists a unique solution that achieves exact interventional consistency, ensuring learned explanations reflect meaningful causal patterns. Experiments on both synthetic causal models and practical RL tasks-including pendulum control and robot table tennis-demonstrate that our approach can uncover important behavioral patterns, biases, and failure modes in trained RL policies.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Explain RL policy behavior via causal model reduction
Learn high-level causal relationships from action perturbations
Ensure interventional consistency in simplified causal explanations
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Introduces random perturbations to policy actions
Develops nonlinear Causal Model Reduction framework
Ensures approximate interventional consistency in models
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.