Shared-Structure 4D Spectral Gaussian Representation for Sparse-View Spectral CT Reconstruction

πŸ“… 2026-08-17
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the challenges of angular undersampling and spectral coupling in sparse-view spectral CT reconstruction by proposing a shared-structure 4D spectral Gaussian representation. The method decouples spatial geometry from spectral attenuation to construct a continuous 4D representation that enables querying unobserved channels, while integrating GSC-Net for efficient structure-spectrum decomposition modeling. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves state-of-the-art reconstruction performance, attaining a PSNR of 36.61 dB, an SSIM of 0.914, and an LPIPS of 0.194. These findings confirm the method’s effectiveness in achieving accurate reconstruction under sparse-view conditions, successfully overcoming the inherent limitations of conventional approaches in handling coupled spectral and geometric information.
πŸ“ Abstract
Sparse-view spectral computed tomography (CT) reconstructs energy-resolved attenuation volumes from limited projection views, requiring simultaneous handling of angular undersampling and spectral coupling. We propose a SharedStructure 4D Spectral Gaussian Representation (4D-SG) that learns shared Gaussian geometry from full spectrum structural projections and uses a Gaussian-wise Spectral Density Curve Network (GSC-Net) to predict Gaussian raw density transformations. This factorization separates shared spatial structure from spectral attenuation variation, avoids independent channel geometry optimization, and establishes a continuous 4D-SG representation from discrete spectral measurements for unobserved spectral channel queries. Experiments on six synthesized, simulated projection, and real projection datasets with 50 views demonstrate the best average performance. Compared with the strongest Gaussian baseline, 4D-SG improves PSNR from 35.56 dB to 36.61 dB, increases SSIM from 0.909 to 0.914, and reduces LPIPS from 0.208 to 0.194, demonstrating its effectiveness for sparse-view spectral CT reconstruction.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Sparse-view spectral CT
Angular undersampling
Spectral coupling
Energy-resolved attenuation reconstruction
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Shared-Structure 4D Spectral Gaussian
Sparse-View Spectral CT
Gaussian-wise Spectral Density Curve Network
Spatial-Spectral Factorization
Continuous Spectral Representation
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
J
Jiancheng Fang
School of Information Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
S
Shaoyu Wang
School of Information Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
Wenjun Xia
Wenjun Xia
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Medical Imaging
Y
Yang Chen
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Qiegen Liu
Qiegen Liu
Nanchang university
medical imagingimage processing