Beyond Truth Discovery: A Two-Stage Framework to Assess the Severity of False Claim during Disasters

📅 2026-08-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出一个两阶段框架,首先提取并验证社交媒体中的虚假信息,然后评估其严重性,以解决灾难期间虚假信息传播的问题。
📝 Abstract
False information spreads rapidly on social media during disasters and can undermine emergency response efforts, public trust, and crisis communication. Existing research primarily focuses on determining whether social media posts contain false information, but provides limited insight into the specific false claims embedded within posts and the severity of individual false claims. To address the limitations, we propose a two-stage framework to assess the severity of false claims during disasters. In the first stage, we develop a false claim extraction agent that identifies false claims from multimodal social media posts containing text, images, videos, and links. A subsequent verification step validates extracted claims with supporting evidence. In the second stage, we define false claim severity as the combination of two complementary dimensions: believability, which determines the likelihood that a claim will be believed, and harmfulness, which captures the potential consequences if it is believed. Human annotators assess both dimensions to construct a claim-level severity benchmark using false claims extracted from Reddit posts related to hurricanes and wildfires. Building upon this benchmark, we investigate false claim severity assessment as a human-AI alignment problem, evaluating whether models can reproduce human judgments under a shared evaluation rubric rather than merely predicting severity labels. Experiments on the benchmark show that traditional supervised models exhibit limited alignment with human judgments, whereas Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve substantially stronger performance. Among the evaluated strategies, in-context learning consistently achieves the strongest alignment with human judgments, highlighting the importance of human examples and shared decision criteria for severity assessment.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

false information
social media
disasters
severity assessment
false claims
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

two-stage framework
false claim extraction
severity assessment
human-AI alignment
in-context learning
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
R
Ruichen Yao
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
T
Tejna Dasari
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
G
Gulshat Baispay
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
A
Aizhan Zaurbek
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Y
Yifan Liu
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Y
Yaokun Liu
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Z
Zelin Li
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Dong Wang
Dong Wang
Professor at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Social SensingHuman-centered AISocial IntelligenceAI for Social GoodAI for Science