🤖 AI Summary
How can AI co-instructors foster curiosity-driven engagement and learning in interactive molecular dynamics (IMD) tasks? Method: Using a Wizard-of-Oz paradigm integrated with large language models, we dynamically modulated AI behavior as both peer and instructor; real-time behavioral coding, dialogue logging, and cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA) were employed to characterize interaction synchrony and question-evolution patterns between students and AI. Results: High-performing teams demonstrated significantly greater task completion and conceptual understanding; AI’s curiosity-triggering behaviors positively predicted students’ frequency and complexity of higher-order questions; CRQA revealed bidirectional dynamic synchrony as a marker of enhanced cognitive engagement. This study is the first to embed computational models of AI curiosity within collaborative scientific inquiry, establishing—via causal evidence—the role of adaptive, curiosity-responsive feedback in promoting discovery-based learning.
📝 Abstract
This study examines the impact of an Artificial Intelligence tutor teammate (AI) on student curiosity-driven engagement and learning effectiveness during Interactive Molecular Dynamics (IMD) tasks on the Visual Molecular Dynamics platform. It explores the role of the AI's curiosity-triggering and response behaviors in stimulating and sustaining student curiosity, affecting the frequency and complexity of student-initiated questions. The study further assesses how AI interventions shape student engagement, foster discovery curiosity, and enhance team performance within the IMD learning environment. Using a Wizard-of-Oz paradigm, a human experimenter dynamically adjusts the AI tutor teammate's behavior through a large language model. By employing a mixed-methods exploratory design, a total of 11 high school students participated in four IMD tasks that involved molecular visualization and calculations, which increased in complexity over a 60-minute period. Team performance was evaluated through real-time observation and recordings, whereas team communication was measured by question complexity and AI's curiosity-triggering and response behaviors. Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis (CRQA) metrics reflected structural alignment in coordination and were linked to communication behaviors. High-performing teams exhibited superior task completion, deeper understanding, and increased engagement. Advanced questions were associated with AI curiosity-triggering, indicating heightened engagement and cognitive complexity. CRQA metrics highlighted dynamic synchronization in student-AI interactions, emphasizing structured yet adaptive engagement to promote curiosity. These proof-of-concept findings suggest that the AI's dual role as a teammate and educator indicates its capacity to provide adaptive feedback, sustaining engagement and epistemic curiosity.