Comparative Analysis of Autonomous Robotic and Manual Techniques for Ultrasonic Sacral Osteotomy: A Preliminary Study

๐Ÿ“… 2026-02-03
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This study addresses the significant trajectory deviations and imprecise depth control inherent in manual ultrasonic sacral osteotomy by proposing, for the first time, an autonomous robotic system for ultrasonic sacral osteotomy. The system integrates a seven-degree-of-freedom robotic arm, an ultrasonic bone scalpel, and optical tracking technology to achieve high-precision osteotomy on Sawbones models. Quantitative evaluation comparing robotic and manual performance demonstrates that the robotic system achieves a root mean square error (RMSE) of only 0.11 mm in trajectory accuracy and a cutting depth of 8.1 mmโ€”closely matching the target depth of 8.0 mm. In contrast, manual operation exhibits a substantially higher trajectory error of 1.10 mm and excessive cutting depth of 16.0 mm. These results indicate that the proposed robotic system effectively overcomes the intrinsic limitations of conventional manual techniques.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
In this paper, we introduce an autonomous Ultrasonic Sacral Osteotomy (USO) robotic system that integrates an ultrasonic osteotome with a seven-degree-of-freedom (DoF) robotic manipulator guided by an optical tracking system. To assess multi-directional control along both the surface trajectory and cutting depth of this system, we conducted quantitative comparisons between manual USO (MUSO) and robotic USO (RUSO) in Sawbones phantoms under identical osteotomy conditions. The RUSO system achieved sub-millimeter trajectory accuracy (0.11 mm RMSE), an order of magnitude improvement over MUSO (1.10 mm RMSE). Moreover, MUSO trials showed substantial over-penetration (16.0 mm achieved vs. 8.0 mm target), whereas the RUSO system maintained precise depth control (8.1 mm). These results demonstrate that robotic procedures can effectively overcome the critical limitations of manual osteotomy, establishing a foundation for safer and more precise sacral resections.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Ultrasonic Sacral Osteotomy
manual osteotomy
trajectory accuracy
cutting depth control
sacral resection
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

autonomous robotic surgery
ultrasonic osteotomy
optical tracking
sacral resection
trajectory accuracy
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
D
Daniyal Maroufi
Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Robotics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
Y
Yash Kulkarni
Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Robotics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
J
Justin E. Bird
Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
J
Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen
Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
Farshid Alambeigi
Farshid Alambeigi
Associate Professor, University of Texas at Austin
Medical roboticsSurgical roboticsSurgical AutonomySurgineeringSoft robotics