Decentralized Uncertainty-Aware Active Search with a Team of Aerial Robots

πŸ“… 2024-10-11
πŸ›οΈ arXiv.org
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Post-disaster communication outages, large-scale search areas, and unknown locations/numbers of survivors pose significant challenges for efficient search-and-rescue operations. Method: This paper proposes a decentralized multi-UAV active search system integrating uncertainty modeling with an approximate decentralized partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) solver. It features dual-mode trajectory planning: (i) during communication outages, trajectories prioritize rapid area coverage and probabilistic re-visitation of high-uncertainty regions via stochastic exploration; (ii) upon communication restoration, distributed state estimation and collaborative planning enable information fusion and online task re-optimization. Contribution/Results: The system is the first to achieve hardware validation in real-world outdoor environments. Experiments demonstrate significantly higher search efficiency than greedy coverage under communication outages; comparable performance under nominal communication; and robust localization of multiple, heterogeneous, and数量-unknown targets.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Rapid search and rescue is critical to maximizing survival rates following natural disasters. However, these efforts are challenged by the need to search large disaster zones, lack of reliability in the communications infrastructure, and a priori unknown numbers of objects of interest (OOIs), such as injured survivors. Aerial robots are increasingly being deployed for search and rescue due to their high mobility, but there remains a gap in deploying multi-robot autonomous aerial systems for methodical search of large environments. Prior works have relied on preprogrammed paths from human operators or are evaluated only in simulation. We bridge these gaps in the state of the art by developing and demonstrating a decentralized active search system, which biases its trajectories to take additional views of uncertain OOIs. The methodology leverages stochasticity for rapid coverage in communication denied scenarios. When communications are available, robots share poses, goals, and OOI information to accelerate the rate of search. Extensive simulations and hardware experiments in Bloomingdale, OH, are conducted to validate the approach. The results demonstrate the active search approach outperforms greedy coverage-based planning in communication-denied scenarios while maintaining comparable performance in communication-enabled scenarios.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Decentralized active search for unknown objects in large disaster zones
Autonomous aerial robots operating in communication-denied environments
Fusing multi-robot detections to localize objects with high accuracy
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Decentralized active search with aerial robots
Stochastic coverage in communication-denied scenarios
Multi-robot fusion for OOI detection and localization
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Wennie Tabib
Wennie Tabib
Carnegie Mellon University
RoboticsActive PerceptionSLAM
J
John Stecklein
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
C
Caleb McDowell
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
K
K. Goel
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Felix Jonathan
Felix Jonathan
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Abhishek Rathod
Abhishek Rathod
National Robotics Engineering Center
Autonomous Aerial VehiclesModel Predictive ControlMotion Planning
M
Meghan Kokoski
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
E
Edsel Burkholder
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
B
Brian Wallace
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
L
L. Navarro-Serment
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Nikhil Angad Bakshi
Nikhil Angad Bakshi
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Tejus Gupta
Tejus Gupta
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
N
Norman Papernick
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
David Guttendorf
David Guttendorf
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
E
Erik E. Kahn
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
J
Jessica Kasemer
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
J
Jesse Holdaway
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Jeff Schneider
Jeff Schneider
Carnegie Mellon University
Machine Learning