ActivePusher: Active Learning and Planning with Residual Physics for Nonprehensile Manipulation

📅 2025-06-05
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
For long-horizon motion planning in non-grasping manipulation tasks (e.g., pushing, rolling), efficient dynamics modeling remains challenging due to the high sample cost of learning-based approaches. This paper proposes a joint framework integrating residual physics-informed modeling with kernel-based uncertainty quantification and active learning. Specifically, it performs information-directed data acquisition in the skill parameter space, explicitly incorporating Gaussian-kernel-estimated model uncertainty into the sampling procedure of Model Predictive Control (MPC). This enhances data efficiency by prioritizing informative queries. Evaluated in simulation and on real robotic platforms, the method reduces required interaction samples by over 40% compared to random sampling baselines, while improving planning success rate by more than 25%. These results demonstrate substantial alleviation of the performance bottleneck imposed by inefficient data collection in learned dynamics models.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Planning with learned dynamics models offers a promising approach toward real-world, long-horizon manipulation, particularly in nonprehensile settings such as pushing or rolling, where accurate analytical models are difficult to obtain. Although learning-based methods hold promise, collecting training data can be costly and inefficient, as it often relies on randomly sampled interactions that are not necessarily the most informative. To address this challenge, we propose ActivePusher, a novel framework that combines residual-physics modeling with kernel-based uncertainty-driven active learning to focus data acquisition on the most informative skill parameters. Additionally, ActivePusher seamlessly integrates with model-based kinodynamic planners, leveraging uncertainty estimates to bias control sampling toward more reliable actions. We evaluate our approach in both simulation and real-world environments and demonstrate that it improves data efficiency and planning success rates compared to baseline methods.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Improving data efficiency in nonprehensile manipulation planning
Reducing training costs via uncertainty-driven active learning
Enhancing planning success with residual-physics modeling integration
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Combines residual-physics with active learning
Uses kernel-based uncertainty-driven data acquisition
Integrates with model-based kinodynamic planners
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Z
Zhuoyun Zhong
Department of Robotics Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
S
Seyedali Golestaneh
Department of Robotics Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Constantinos Chamzas
Constantinos Chamzas
Assistant Professor, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
RoboticsMotion PlanningPlanning Under UncertaintyLearning and PlanningMachine Learning