đ¤ AI Summary
Existing collision-avoidance models are fragmented and scenario-specific, lacking a unified theoretical account of human collision-avoidance behavior. This paper introduces the first computational cognitive model of driving collision avoidance grounded in active inferenceâspecifically, free-energy minimizationâsystematically integrating Bayesian decision-making, evidence accumulation, and motor control. The model comprehensively characterizes the full behavioral cascade: threat detection, avoidance decision-making, and action execution, across two canonical scenariosârear-end braking and lateral intrusion. Its key contribution lies in the first systematic application of the active-inference framework to driving collision avoidance, enabling unified, cross-scenario explanation of behavioral phenomena across multiple dimensions: response timing, strategy selection, and motor execution. Validated against high-fidelity driving simulation data, the model accurately reproduces empirically observed patternsâincluding meta-analytic aggregate effects and scenario-specific response profilesâdemonstrating high fidelity to real-world driver behavior.
đ Abstract
Collision avoidance -- involving a rapid threat detection and quick execution of the appropriate evasive maneuver -- is a critical aspect of driving. However, existing models of human collision avoidance behavior are fragmented, focusing on specific scenarios or only describing certain aspects of the avoidance behavior, such as response times. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing a novel computational cognitive model of human collision avoidance behavior based on active inference. Active inference provides a unified approach to modeling human behavior: the minimization of free energy. Building on prior active inference work, our model incorporates established cognitive mechanisms such as evidence accumulation to simulate human responses in two distinct collision avoidance scenarios: front-to-rear lead vehicle braking and lateral incursion by an oncoming vehicle. We demonstrate that our model explains a wide range of previous empirical findings on human collision avoidance behavior. Specifically, the model closely reproduces both aggregate results from meta-analyses previously reported in the literature and detailed, scenario-specific effects observed in a recent driving simulator study, including response timing, maneuver selection, and execution. Our results highlight the potential of active inference as a unified framework for understanding and modeling human behavior in complex real-life driving tasks.