MammoExpert: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Mammography Diagnosis

πŸ“… 2026-06-19
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Existing mammography datasets lack large-scale, high-quality annotations with structured diagnostic reasoning, limiting the application of AI in breast cancer subtype identification and interpretable diagnosis. This study introduces the first mammography dataset annotated with a three-stage Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning framework, encompassing 67 WHO pathological subtypes. Nine senior radiologists annotated each case with 42 imaging features, systematically organized into three reasoning phases: initial observations, factual assessments, and diagnostic synthesis. This structured CoT annotation establishes a new benchmark for interpretable AI, yielding a 4% improvement in classification accuracy on the MammoExpert test set. When combined with CBIS-DDSM for training, the approach achieves performance gains of 7.1%, and further enhances accuracy by 6.9% and 6.7% on INBreast and Vindr, respectively.
πŸ“ Abstract
Mammography is an essential tool for breast cancer detection, with millions of examinations conducted annually. However, publicly available high-quality mammography datasets for AI development remain limited in both scale and annotation richness, particularly regarding pathological subtype coverage and structured diagnostic reasoning annotations. In this paper, we present MammoExpert, the first mammography dataset with Chain-of-Thought reasoning annotations across three diagnostic phases: (i) primal observation, (ii) factual assessment, and (iii) diagnostic synthesis. Comprising 2,379 mammography images covering 67 WHO-classified histopathology subtypes, each exam provides 42 radiographic features annotated by nine senior radiologists. We evaluate its performance on the breast lesion classification task, demonstrating superior accuracy and reasonability compared to existing classification models. Combining public dataset CBIS-DDSM with MammoExpert yields 7.1\% classification accuracy improvement, while the training model to learn CoT reasoning achieves another 4\% gain on the MammoExpert test set. Similar improvements are observed on INBreast and Vindr datasets, where the full approach yields accuracy gains of 6.9\% and 6.7\%, respectively. MammoExpert can serve as a benchmark for interpretable breast lesion diagnosis through explicit CoT reasoning.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

mammography
dataset limitation
pathological subtypes
diagnostic reasoning
annotation richness
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Chain-of-Thought reasoning
mammography diagnosis
structured diagnostic annotation
breast lesion classification
interpretable AI
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
D
Di Dai
State Key Laboratory of General Artificial Intelligence, School of Intelligence Science and Technology, Peking University
B
Bo Liu
State Key Laboratory of General Artificial Intelligence, School of Intelligence Science and Technology, Peking University
Youcheng Li
Youcheng Li
Peking University
Computer Vision
H
Haojun Yu
State Key Laboratory of General Artificial Intelligence, School of Intelligence Science and Technology, Peking University
Z
Zhouhang Bian
School of Computer Science and Engineer, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Q
Quanlin Wu
Center for Data Science, Peking University
D
Dong Wang
Yizhun co. ltd
S
Sichen Meng
International School, Beijing University of Post and Telecommunications
H
Hongye Xuan
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Z
Zijie Lan
Future Technology College, Xi’an Jiaotong University
Shenda Hong
Shenda Hong
Assistant Professor, Peking University
AI ECGBiosignalAI for Digital HealthHealth Data ScienceAI for Healthcare
Liwei Wang
Liwei Wang
Professor, Peking University
machine learning