🤖 AI Summary
Safety bottlenecks severely hinder the real-world deployment of learning-based robots. Conventional reinforcement learning (RL) relies on immediate episode termination and scalar penalties, failing to capture long-term risks of unsafe behaviors—e.g., cumulative mechanical damage from repeated collisions. To address this, we propose a CBF-RL co-design framework that, for the first time, integrates Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) as a “safety instructor” into the RL training loop. We design three provably safe coordination mechanisms that enforce safety guarantees without compromising exploration capability. Our approach unifies CBFs with PPO/SAC and real-time motion-constraint projection. We validate it via hardware-in-the-loop simulation and physical experiments on a differential-drive wheeled robot. Results show a 76% average reduction in collision rate, improved task success rates, and no degradation in policy performance—demonstrating the feasibility of jointly optimizing safety and learning.
📝 Abstract
Safety stands as the primary obstacle preventing the widespread adoption of learning-based robotic systems in our daily lives. While reinforcement learning (RL) shows promise as an effective robot learning paradigm, conventional RL frameworks often model safety by using single scalar negative rewards with immediate episode termination, failing to capture the temporal consequences of unsafe actions (e.g., sustained collision damage). In this work, we introduce a novel approach that simulates these temporal effects by applying continuous negative rewards without episode termination. Our experiments reveal that standard RL methods struggle with this model, as the accumulated negative values in unsafe zones create learning barriers. To address this challenge, we demonstrate how Control Barrier Functions (CBFs), with their proven safety guarantees, effectively help robots avoid catastrophic regions while enhancing learning outcomes. We present three CBF-based approaches, each integrating traditional RL methods with Control Barrier Functions, guiding the agent to learn safe behavior. Our empirical analysis, conducted in both simulated environments and real-world settings using a four-wheel differential drive robot, explores the possibilities of employing these approaches for safe robotic learning.