🤖 AI Summary
To address high test-time computational overhead and low trial-and-error efficiency—leading to inference latency in large language model (LLM)-based code generation—this paper proposes ThinkCoder, a two-stage “explore-refine” paradigm. The first stage performs deep forward reasoning via diverse solution-space exploration and optimal-solution selection. The second stage introduces preference-driven Reinforced Self-Training (ReST), leveraging successful execution trajectories to optimize the generation policy *prior* to inference. ThinkCoder enables efficient single-LLM deployment and substantially reduces test-time computation. Experiments show that on HumanEval and MBPP, it achieves a 3.0% Pass@1 improvement over MapCoder while consuming only 6.4% of its compute cost; it outperforms AgentCoder’s 5-turn results within just 2 generations; and LLaMA2-7B reaches the performance ceiling of comparable methods using only 20% of their computational budget.
📝 Abstract
Code generation is crucial in software engineering for automating the coding process efficiently. While test-time computation methods show promise, they suffer from high latency due to multiple computation rounds. To overcome this, we introduce extbf{ThinkCoder}, a framework that combines thorough exploration with optimal refinement. The exploration phase diversifies the solution space by searching for potential solutions, followed by a refinement phase that enhances precision. This approach allows us to select the best solution through careful consideration before taking action, avoiding excessive trial and error. To further minimize test-time computation overhead, we introduce preference-driven optimization with Reinforced Self-Training (ReST), which uses exploration trajectories from ThinkCoder to guide LLM's evolution. This approach enhances LLM's exploration efficiency via preference learning, cutting costs while maintaining accuracy. ThinkCoder boosts the performance with a single LLM, excelling on benchmarks like HumanEval and MBPP. Compared to SOTA models, it improves Pass@1 by 3.0% over MapCoder with just 6.4% of the computation cost. Against AgentCoder, ThinkCoder achieves a 0.5% higher Pass@1 after 2 rounds, outperforming AgentCoder's 5 rounds. Additionally, ReST with success trajectories enhances efficiency, allowing models like LLaMA2-7B to achieve competitive results using only 20% of the computational resources. These results highlight the framework's effectiveness and scalability.