DYNUS: Uncertainty-aware Trajectory Planner in Dynamic Unknown Environments

📅 2025-04-23
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the challenge of real-time trajectory invalidation and collision risk in dynamic, unknown environments—where obstacle trajectories are unpredictable—this paper proposes a safe, fast, and adaptive online trajectory planning method. The approach integrates uncertainty-aware modeling with multi-modal trajectory co-optimization. Its key contributions are: (1) a novel spatio-temporal joint hard-constraint local planning framework; (2) a dynamic re-planning mechanism unifying exploration, safety, and emergency response modalities; and (3) an efficient spatio-temporal safe corridor generation algorithm based on variable elimination. Evaluated in simulation and real-world experiments across quadrotor, wheeled, and quadruped robot platforms, the method achieves 100% task success rate and reduces average traversal time by 25.0% compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This paper introduces DYNUS, an uncertainty-aware trajectory planner designed for dynamic unknown environments. Operating in such settings presents many challenges -- most notably, because the agent cannot predict the ground-truth future paths of obstacles, a previously planned trajectory can become unsafe at any moment, requiring rapid replanning to avoid collisions. Recently developed planners have used soft-constraint approaches to achieve the necessary fast computation times; however, these methods do not guarantee collision-free paths even with static obstacles. In contrast, hard-constraint methods ensure collision-free safety, but typically have longer computation times. To address these issues, we propose three key contributions. First, the DYNUS Global Planner (DGP) and Temporal Safe Corridor Generation operate in spatio-temporal space and handle both static and dynamic obstacles in the 3D environment. Second, the Safe Planning Framework leverages a combination of exploratory, safe, and contingency trajectories to flexibly re-route when potential future collisions with dynamic obstacles are detected. Finally, the Fast Hard-Constraint Local Trajectory Formulation uses a variable elimination approach to reduce the problem size and enable faster computation by pre-computing dependencies between free and dependent variables while still ensuring collision-free trajectories. We evaluated DYNUS in a variety of simulations, including dense forests, confined office spaces, cave systems, and dynamic environments. Our experiments show that DYNUS achieves a success rate of 100% and travel times that are approximately 25.0% faster than state-of-the-art methods. We also evaluated DYNUS on multiple platforms -- a quadrotor, a wheeled robot, and a quadruped -- in both simulation and hardware experiments.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Plans safe trajectories in dynamic unknown environments
Ensures collision-free paths with fast replanning
Handles both static and dynamic 3D obstacles
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

DGP and Temporal Safe Corridor handle 3D obstacles
Safe Planning Framework uses multiple trajectory types
Fast Hard-Constraint reduces problem size for speed
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Kota Kondo
Kota Kondo
PhD Student at MIT AeroAstro
Trajectory PlanningAutonomyUAVOptimization
Mason B. Peterson
Mason B. Peterson
Graduate Student, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIT
perceptioncomputer visionroboticsSLAM
Nicholas Rober
Nicholas Rober
MIT
Safe AutonomyLearningControl SystemsRobotics
J
Juan Rached Viso
Departments of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
L
Lucas Jia
Departments of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Jialin Chen
Jialin Chen
Yale University
Foundation ModelsGraph LearningMultimodal RAG
H
Harvey Merton
Departments of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Jonathan P. How
Jonathan P. How
Ford Professor of Engineering, AA Dept., Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Control systemsMulti-agent systemsAerial RoboticsSensor FusionAutonomous Driving