ICGM-FRAX: Iterative Cross Graph Matching for Hip Fracture Risk Assessment using Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Images

📅 2025-04-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the clinical need for early identification of hip fracture risk in older adults by proposing an interpretable prediction method based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images. To overcome limitations of existing tools—such as the FRAX algorithm and deep learning models—including poor interpretability and heavy reliance on large-scale annotated datasets, we introduce a novel iterative cross-image matching framework. Specifically, DXA images are modeled as anatomical semantic geometric graphs, where nodes represent region-of-interest (ROI) centroids and edges encode Euclidean distances. Structural similarity to a reference fracture atlas is assessed via multi-template iterative graph matching, eliminating the need for deep neural networks. Evaluated on 547 DXA scans from the UK Biobank, our method achieves a sensitivity of 0.9869—significantly outperforming FRAX and state-of-the-art imaging-based approaches—while ensuring high accuracy, strong clinical interpretability, and practical deployability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Hip fractures represent a major health concern, particularly among the elderly, often leading decreased mobility and increased mortality. Early and accurate detection of at risk individuals is crucial for effective intervention. In this study, we propose Iterative Cross Graph Matching for Hip Fracture Risk Assessment (ICGM-FRAX), a novel approach for predicting hip fractures using Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) images. ICGM-FRAX involves iteratively comparing a test (subject) graph with multiple template graphs representing the characteristics of hip fracture subjects to assess the similarity and accurately to predict hip fracture risk. These graphs are obtained as follows. The DXA images are separated into multiple regions of interest (RoIs), such as the femoral head, shaft, and lesser trochanter. Radiomic features are then calculated for each RoI, with the central coordinates used as nodes in a graph. The connectivity between nodes is established according to the Euclidean distance between these coordinates. This process transforms each DXA image into a graph, where each node represents a RoI, and edges derived by the centroids of RoIs capture the spatial relationships between them. If the test graph closely matches a set of template graphs representing subjects with incident hip fractures, it is classified as indicating high hip fracture risk. We evaluated our method using 547 subjects from the UK Biobank dataset, and experimental results show that ICGM-FRAX achieved a sensitivity of 0.9869, demonstrating high accuracy in predicting hip fractures.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Predicting hip fracture risk using DXA images
Assessing similarity between test and template graphs
Improving accuracy in early hip fracture detection
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Iterative Cross Graph Matching for risk assessment
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry image transformation
Graph-based similarity comparison for fracture prediction
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Chen Zhao
Department of Computer Science, Kennesaw State University
A
Anjum Shaik
Department of Applied Computing, Michigan Technological University
J
Joyce H. Keyak
Department of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California
Nancy E. Lane
Nancy E. Lane
Distinguished Professor
osteoarthritisosteoporosisbone cell biology
J
Jeffrey D. Deng
Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College
Kuan-Jui Su
Kuan-Jui Su
Tulane University, Division of Biomedical Informatics and Genomics
Bioinformaticsmachine learningnetwork analysissystem biology
Qiuying Sha
Qiuying Sha
Michigan Technological University
Statistical Genetics
H
Hui Shen
Division of Biomedical Informatics and Genomics, Tulane Center of Biomedical Informatics and Genomics, Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University
H
Hong-Wen Deng
Division of Biomedical Informatics and Genomics, Tulane Center of Biomedical Informatics and Genomics, Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University
Weihua Zhou
Weihua Zhou
Michigan Technological University
Medical Imaging and Informatics