Computational Thinking Development in AI Agent Creation_A Mixed-Methods Study

📅 2026-05-13
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

186K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the developmental mechanisms and individual differences in computational thinking (CT) among young learners engaged in no-code AI agent creation. Drawing on a mixed-methods approach—including pre- and post-tests, behavioral logs, and interviews—with 93 upper-primary students participating in a five-day CocoFlow workshop, the research reveals significant gains in abstraction and algorithmic thinking (Cohen’s d ≈ 0.70). Furthermore, engagement in iterative testing positively predicts growth in self-efficacy. A key contribution is the identification of a “zone of optimal development” effect: students with moderate initial CT proficiency demonstrated the greatest improvement (η² = 0.55), challenging assumptions of linear learning progression and underscoring the necessity of differentiated instructional scaffolding.
📝 Abstract
This mixed-methods study examined computational thinking (CT) development among 93 pre-high school students in a five-day AI agent creation workshop using CocoFlow, a no-code platform. Integrating pre-post assessments, behavioral logs, and interviews, we investigated CT development and how initial CT levels shape learning trajectories. Results revealed significant improvements in abstract thinking (effect size d = 0.71) and algorithmic thinking (effect size d = 0.70). Hierarchical regression identified iterative testing engagement as a predictor of self-efficacy gains (beta = 0.20, p = 0.05). Notably, students with moderate initial CT levels demonstrated substantially greater gains than both high-CT and low-CT peers, revealing an Optimal Development Zone effect (eta squared = 0.55). Qualitative analysis showed moderate-CT students exhibited adaptive expertise, while high-CT students risked over-engineering and low-CT students struggled with task decomposition. These findings challenge linear learning assumptions and provide evidence for differentiated scaffolding in CT education.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Computational Thinking
AI Agent Creation
Learning Trajectories
Optimal Development Zone
Differentiated Scaffolding
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

computational thinking
AI agent creation
no-code platform
Optimal Development Zone
mixed-methods study
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.