Disturbance Compensation for Safe Kinematic Control of Robotic Systems with Closed Architecture

📅 2025-12-04
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Commercial robotic torque controllers are typically closed-loop, non-modifiable, and subject to dynamic uncertainties. To address this, we propose an outer-loop disturbance-compensation framework that operates without requiring inner-loop model parameters. Our method integrates an Extended State Observer (ESO) for composite disturbance estimation and a Robust Control Barrier Function (RCBF) to enforce state-wise safety constraints, with closed-loop stability and formal safety guarantees rigorously established via Lyapunov theory. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first outer-loop control framework achieving simultaneous high-precision trajectory tracking (32% reduction in tracking error experimentally), strong robustness against disturbances, and provable full-state safety satisfaction. The design is deployment-friendly and highly practical for industrial applications. Experimental validation on a PUMA manipulator demonstrates superior performance over existing methods in terms of tracking accuracy, robustness, and safety compliance.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In commercial robotic systems, it is common to encounter a closed inner-loop torque controller that is not user-modifiable. However, the outer-loop controller, which sends kinematic commands such as position or velocity for the inner-loop controller to track, is typically exposed to users. In this work, we focus on the development of an easily integrated add-on at the outer-loop layer by combining disturbance rejection control and robust control barrier function for high-performance tracking and safe control of the whole dynamic system of an industrial manipulator. This is particularly beneficial when 1) the inner-loop controller is imperfect, unmodifiable, and uncertain; and 2) the dynamic model exhibits significant uncertainty. Stability analysis, formal safety guarantee proof, and hardware experiments with a PUMA robotic manipulator are presented. Our solution demonstrates superior performance in terms of simplicity of implementation, robustness, tracking precision, and safety compared to the state of the art. Video: https://youtu.be/zw1tanvrV8Q
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Compensates disturbances in closed-architecture robotic systems for safe kinematic control.
Ensures safety and tracking despite unmodifiable, uncertain inner-loop controllers.
Addresses dynamic model uncertainties using robust control barrier functions.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Outer-loop add-on combines disturbance rejection and robust control barrier
Ensures safe kinematic control despite unmodifiable inner-loop torque controllers
Provides stability, safety guarantees, and robust tracking for uncertain dynamics
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
F
Fan Zhang
Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, USA
J
Jinfeng Chen
Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, USA
J
Joseph J. B. Mvogo Ahanda
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Ebolowa, Cameroon
Hanz Richter
Hanz Richter
Cleveland State University
Control SystemsRoboticsMechatronics
Ge Lv
Ge Lv
Assistant Professor, Clemson University
RoboticsControlExoskeletonsProsthesesBipedal Locomotion
B
Bin Hu
Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, USA
Q
Qin Lin
Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, USA