MedTRACE: Tool-Augmented Multimodal Clinical Reasoning Agents for Evidence-Grounded Decision-Making

📅 2026-09-13
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出MedTRACE,通过多模态编码、工具辅助决策和证据验证来提高临床决策的准确性、可解释性和可靠性。
📝 Abstract
Multimodal clinical decision-making requires reliable reasoning over heterogeneous evidence from electronic health records, medical images, and physiological signals. Existing models typically map these inputs directly to diagnoses without explicitly assessing evidence sufficiency, tool-use requirements, or diagnostic uncertainty. This paper presents MedTRACE, a tool-augmented multimodal clinical reasoning agent for evidence-grounded decision-making. MedTRACE uses modality-specific encoders to construct a unified patient-state representation and performs an iterative loop of hypothesis formation, toolaware deliberation, and evidence verification. It dynamically invokes visual grounding, evidence retrieval, and structured parsing tools to locate diagnosis-relevant regions, retrieve clinical knowledge and similar cases, and extract structured findings. The acquired evidence enters an evidence memory, where a consistency verifier confirms or revises the current hypothesis. MedTRACE outputs a diagnosis together with supporting evidence, an auditable reasoning trace, and calibrated confidence. Experiments on multiple multimodal clinical diagnosis benchmarks show that MedTRACE improves diagnostic accuracy by 5.4% and AUROC by 4.7 percentage points over the strongest baseline. It also improves evidenceselection F1 by 8.2 percentage points and visual-grounding IoU by 6.5 percentage points, reduces expected calibration error by 31.6%, and decreases unsupported diagnostic errors by 27.8%. These results demonstrate that active evidence acquisition and verification improve the accuracy, interpretability, and reliability of multimodal clinical decisionmaking.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

multimodal clinical decision-making
evidence sufficiency
diagnostic uncertainty
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

tool-augmented
multimodal clinical reasoning
evidence-grounded decision-making
hypothesis formation
toolaware deliberation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
J
Ji Lu
Vanderbilt University, United States
L
Lifei Liu
Wichita State University, United States
H
Haoran Yu
University of Florida, United States
X
Xianglong Wang
Wyze Inc., United States
Y
Yiru Fang
Wyze Inc., United States
K
Kuo Yang
Northeastern University, United States
H
Huiran Duan
City University of New York, United States
Jianping Gou
Jianping Gou
Southwest University
Pattern RecognitionMachine Learning