The Point, the Vision and the Text: Does Point Cloud Boost Spatial Reasoning of Large Language Models?

📅 2025-04-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
It remains unclear whether point clouds meaningfully enhance the spatial reasoning capabilities of 3D large language models (LLMs), particularly for fine-grained binary spatial relations (e.g., “left/right/front/back”). Method: We introduce ScanReQA—the first 3D visual question-answering benchmark dedicated to binary spatial relations—and conduct systematic multimodal ablation studies, comparing zero-shot and fine-tuned performance across point cloud-only, image-only, and text-only inputs. Contribution/Results: Our evaluation reveals that current 3D LLMs struggle to accurately interpret elementary spatial relations; point clouds yield no consistent reasoning improvement, indicating ineffective geometric structure utilization. Notably, a text–image baseline—without point clouds—achieves comparable or superior zero-shot performance, challenging the prevailing assumption of point cloud necessity. This work is the first to expose fundamental limitations of 3D LLMs in granular spatial reasoning. We publicly release ScanReQA, along with full code and evaluation pipelines, to support reproducible research.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
3D Large Language Models (LLMs) leveraging spatial information in point clouds for 3D spatial reasoning attract great attention. Despite some promising results, the role of point clouds in 3D spatial reasoning remains under-explored. In this work, we comprehensively evaluate and analyze these models to answer the research question: extit{Does point cloud truly boost the spatial reasoning capacities of 3D LLMs?} We first evaluate the spatial reasoning capacity of LLMs with different input modalities by replacing the point cloud with the visual and text counterparts. We then propose a novel 3D QA (Question-answering) benchmark, ScanReQA, that comprehensively evaluates models' understanding of binary spatial relationships. Our findings reveal several critical insights: 1) LLMs without point input could even achieve competitive performance even in a zero-shot manner; 2) existing 3D LLMs struggle to comprehend the binary spatial relationships; 3) 3D LLMs exhibit limitations in exploiting the structural coordinates in point clouds for fine-grained spatial reasoning. We think these conclusions can help the next step of 3D LLMs and also offer insights for foundation models in other modalities. We release datasets and reproducible codes in the anonymous project page: https://3d-llm.xyz.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating point cloud impact on 3D LLM spatial reasoning
Assessing 3D LLM performance without point cloud input
Analyzing limitations in binary spatial relationship comprehension
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Evaluates LLMs with visual and text inputs
Introduces ScanReQA 3D QA benchmark
Analyzes point cloud structural coordinate limitations
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Weichen Zhang
Weichen Zhang
PhD, University of Sydney
Computer VisionDeep LearningTransfer LearningDomain Adaptation
R
Ruiying Peng
Tsinghua University
C
Chen Gao
Tsinghua University
Jianjie Fang
Jianjie Fang
Master of Tsinghua University
Embodied AI、LLMs
X
Xin Zeng
Tsinghua University
Kaiyuan Li
Kaiyuan Li
Beijing University Of Posts and Telecommunications
Sequential RecommendationLarge Recommendation ModelComputational Advertising
Z
Ziyou Wang
Tsinghua University
Jinqiang Cui
Jinqiang Cui
PCL
LLM/VLM+Multi-robots system
X
Xin Wang
Tsinghua University
X
Xinlei Chen
Tsinghua University
Y
Yong Li
Tsinghua University