Bohrium + SciMaster: Building the Infrastructure and Ecosystem for Agentic Science at Scale

📅 2025-12-23
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
AI agents face critical bottlenecks in long-horizon, complex scientific workflows—including poor observability, low reproducibility, weak governance, and non-standardized tooling. Method: This paper proposes the “Scientific Intelligence Foundation” paradigm, enabling execution-level composability, auditability, and evolvability of models, knowledge, and tools. We design a two-layer infrastructure-and-orchestration architecture integrating: (i) a traceable computing hub (Bohrium), (ii) a multi-agent scientific workflow engine (SciMaster), (iii) execution-trace verification, (iv) agent-ready interface abstractions, and (v) a scientific asset hosting protocol. Contribution/Results: Deployed across 11 real-world research domains, the flagship agent reduces end-to-end scientific cycle time by one to two orders of magnitude and generates over one million traceable, evaluable execution signals. The framework significantly enhances agent reusability, evolutionary adaptability, and systematic optimization capability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
AI agents are emerging as a practical way to run multi-step scientific workflows that interleave reasoning with tool use and verification, pointing to a shift from isolated AI-assisted steps toward emph{agentic science at scale}. This shift is increasingly feasible, as scientific tools and models can be invoked through stable interfaces and verified with recorded execution traces, and increasingly necessary, as AI accelerates scientific output and stresses the peer-review and publication pipeline, raising the bar for traceability and credible evaluation. However, scaling agentic science remains difficult: workflows are hard to observe and reproduce; many tools and laboratory systems are not agent-ready; execution is hard to trace and govern; and prototype AI Scientist systems are often bespoke, limiting reuse and systematic improvement from real workflow signals. We argue that scaling agentic science requires an infrastructure-and-ecosystem approach, instantiated in Bohrium+SciMaster. Bohrium acts as a managed, traceable hub for AI4S assets -- akin to a HuggingFace of AI for Science -- that turns diverse scientific data, software, compute, and laboratory systems into agent-ready capabilities. SciMaster orchestrates these capabilities into long-horizon scientific workflows, on which scientific agents can be composed and executed. Between infrastructure and orchestration, a emph{scientific intelligence substrate} organizes reusable models, knowledge, and components into executable building blocks for workflow reasoning and action, enabling composition, auditability, and improvement through use. We demonstrate this stack with eleven representative master agents in real workflows, achieving orders-of-magnitude reductions in end-to-end scientific cycle time and generating execution-grounded signals from real workloads at multi-million scale.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Scaling agentic science requires infrastructure and ecosystem
Workflows lack observability, reproducibility, and traceability
Many scientific tools and systems are not agent-ready
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bohrium provides managed hub for AI4S assets
SciMaster orchestrates long-horizon scientific workflows
Scientific intelligence substrate enables reusable executable building blocks
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Linfeng Zhang
Linfeng Zhang
DP Technology; AI for Science Institute
AI for Sciencemulti-scale modelingmolecular simulationdrug/materials design
Siheng Chen
Siheng Chen
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Collective intelligenceLLM agentgraph signal processingcollaborative perception
Y
Yuzhu Cai
Beihang University, Beijing, China
Jingyi Chai
Jingyi Chai
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Large Language ModelFederated Learning
J
Junhan Chang
DP Technology, Beijing, China
K
Kun Chen
Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Z
Zhi X. Chen
Peking University, Beijing, China
Z
Zhaohan Ding
DP Technology, Beijing, China
Yuwen Du
Yuwen Du
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Multi-AgentAutonomous Driving Simulation
Y
Yuanpeng Gao
DP Technology, Beijing, China
Y
Yuan Gao
DP Technology, Beijing, China
J
Jing Gao
DP Technology, Beijing, China
Zhifeng Gao
Zhifeng Gao
DP Technology
Data MiningMachine LearningAI for ScienceAI for Industry
Q
Qiangqiang Gu
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Y
Yanhui Hong
DP Technology, Beijing, China
Y
Yuan Huang
DP Technology, Beijing, China
X
Xi Fang
DP Technology, Beijing, China
X
Xiaohong Ji
DP Technology, Beijing, China
Guolin Ke
Guolin Ke
DP Technology
Machine LearningAI for Science
Zixing Lei
Zixing Lei
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
VisionAutonomous System
X
Xinyu Li
AI for Science Institute, Beijing, China
Y
Yongge Li
DP Technology, Beijing, China
R
Ruoxue Liao
DP Technology, Beijing, China
H
Hang Lin
Tongji University, Shanghai, China
X
Xiaolu Lin
DP Technology, Beijing, China