🤖 AI Summary
Direct measurement of power losses in power electronics digital twins remains infeasible due to hardware and operational constraints.
Method: This paper proposes a physics-informed, temperature-sensor-only power loss inversion method. It introduces a hybrid framework integrating neural networks with a reduced-order thermal model, enabling differentiable backward propagation through thermal dynamics for the first time. A physics-guided loss function and adaptive normalization strategy are further designed to jointly optimize accuracy, stability, and real-time performance.
Results: Experimental validation demonstrates significant improvements: temperature prediction error decreases from 7.2±6.8°C to 0.3±0.3°C, and power loss estimation error drops from 5.4±6.6 W to 0.2±0.3 W. The proposed approach substantially outperforms conventional pure-physics models, establishing a high-fidelity, deployable paradigm for loss-aware digital twins in power electronics systems.
📝 Abstract
Digital twins for power electronics require accurate power losses whose direct measurements are often impractical or impossible in real-world applications. This paper presents a novel hybrid framework that combines physics-based thermal modeling with data-driven techniques to identify and correct power losses accurately using only temperature measurements. Our approach leverages a cascaded architecture where a neural network learns to correct the outputs of a nominal power loss model by backpropagating through a reduced-order thermal model. We explore two neural architectures, a bootstrapped feedforward network, and a recurrent neural network, demonstrating that the bootstrapped feedforward approach achieves superior performance while maintaining computational efficiency for real-time applications. Between the interconnection, we included normalization strategies and physics-guided training loss functions to preserve stability and ensure physical consistency. Experimental results show that our hybrid model reduces both temperature estimation errors (from 7.2+-6.8{deg}C to 0.3+-0.3{deg}C) and power loss prediction errors (from 5.4+-6.6W to 0.2+-0.3W) compared to traditional physics-based approaches, even in the presence of thermal model uncertainties. This methodology allows us to accurately estimate power losses without direct measurements, making it particularly helpful for real-time industrial applications where sensor placement is hindered by cost and physical limitations.