Do Clinical Question Answering Systems Really Need Specialised Medical Fine Tuning?

๐Ÿ“… 2026-01-19
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work proposes MEDASSESS-X, a novel framework that addresses the limitations of costly and narrowly generalizable medical-domain fine-tuning in clinical question-answering systems. For the first time, it achieves cross-model medical consistency during inference by aligning model activations through lightweight steering vectors, eliminating the need for fine-tuning while maintaining compatibility with both general-purpose and medical-specialized large language models. By effectively mitigating โ€œspecialization hallucinations,โ€ the method consistently enhances performance across multiple model families, yielding up to a 6% improvement in accuracy, a 7% gain in factual consistency, and a 50% reduction in safety-related errors.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Clinical Question-Answering (CQA) industry systems are increasingly rely on Large Language Models (LLMs), yet their deployment is often guided by the assumption that domain-specific fine-tuning is essential. Although specialised medical LLMs such as BioBERT, BioGPT, and PubMedBERT remain popular, they face practical limitations including narrow coverage, high retraining costs, and limited adaptability. Efforts based on Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) have attempted to address these assumptions but continue to reinforce what we term the SPECIALISATION FALLACY-the belief that specialised medical LLMs are inherently superior for CQA. To address this assumption, we introduce MEDASSESS-X, a deployment-industry-oriented CQA framework that applies alignment at inference time rather than through SFT. MEDASSESS-X uses lightweight steering vectors to guide model activations toward medically consistent reasoning without updating model weights or requiring domain-specific retraining. This inference-time alignment layer stabilises CQA performance across both general-purpose and specialised medical LLMs, thereby resolving the SPECIALISATION FALLACY. Empirically, MEDASSESS-X delivers consistent gains across all LLM families, improving Accuracy by up to +6%, Factual Consistency by +7%, and reducing Safety Error Rate by as much as 50%.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Clinical Question Answering
Large Language Models
Domain-specific Fine-tuning
Specialisation Fallacy
Medical LLMs
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

inference-time alignment
steering vectors
clinical question answering
specialisation fallacy
medical LLMs
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.