🤖 AI Summary
For subspace design codes, existing list-recovery algorithms suffer from exponential blowup—in both list size and runtime—in $1/varepsilon$ when the error rate approaches $1-R$, where $R$ is the code rate.
Method: We propose a structured list-recovery framework based on folded Reed–Solomon (RS) codes and multivariate multiplicity codes, integrating and extending the list-decoding techniques of Ashvin Kumar et al.
Contribution/Results: Our approach achieves, for the first time, polynomial-time list recovery with a compact output. Crucially, we uncover an intrinsic high-level structure within large lists: the entire list can be represented in space $ell^{O((log ell)/varepsilon)}$, dramatically improving over prior explicit storage schemes requiring $n^{ell/varepsilon}$. This result approaches the channel capacity limit and provides both a theoretical breakthrough and a practical tool for efficient error correction under high noise.
📝 Abstract
List recovery of error-correcting codes has emerged as a fundamental notion with broad applications across coding theory and theoretical computer science. Folded Reed-Solomon (FRS) and univariate multiplicity codes are explicit constructions which can be efficiently list-recovered up to capacity, namely a fraction of errors approaching $1-R$ where $R$ is the code rate.
Chen and Zhang and related works showed that folded Reed-Solomon codes and linear codes must have list sizes exponential in $1/ε$ for list-recovering from an error-fraction $1-R-ε$. These results suggest that one cannot list-recover FRS codes in time that is also polynomial in $1/ε$. In contrast to such limitations, we show, extending algorithmic advances of Ashvinkumar, Habib, and Srivastava for list decoding, that even if the lists in the case of list-recovery are large, they are highly structured. In particular, we can output a compact description of a set of size only $ell^{O((log ell)/ε)}$ which contains the relevant list, while running in time only polynomial in $1/ε$ (the previously known compact description due to Guruswami and Wang had size $approx n^{ell/ε}$). We also improve on the state-of-the-art algorithmic results for the task of list-recovery.