The MICCAI Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) Challenge 2024: Efficient and Robust Aggregation Methods for Federated Learning

📅 2025-12-05
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the poor model robustness and low communication efficiency in federated segmentation of glioma subregions (enhancing tumor—ET, tumor core—TC, whole tumor—WT) from multiparametric MRI. We propose a novel weight aggregation method based on a PID controller, dynamically regulating client weight updates within the BraTS multicenter federated learning framework to enhance training stability and accelerate convergence. Experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance: Dice similarity coefficients of 0.733 (ET), 0.761 (TC), and 0.751 (WT), with corresponding 95th-percentile Hausdorff distances of 33.922 mm, 33.623 mm, and 32.309 mm; the overall convergence score reaches 0.764—surpassing all prior top-performing methods in the BraTS Federated Challenge. The key contribution is the first integration of control-theoretic principles into federated weight aggregation, simultaneously improving segmentation accuracy, model robustness, and communication efficiency.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We present the design and results of the MICCAI Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) Challenge 2024, which focuses on federated learning (FL) for glioma sub-region segmentation in multi-parametric MRI and evaluates new weight aggregation methods aimed at improving robustness and efficiency. Six participating teams were evaluated using a standardized FL setup and a multi-institutional dataset derived from the BraTS glioma benchmark, consisting of 1,251 training cases, 219 validation cases, and 570 hidden test cases with segmentations for enhancing tumor (ET), tumor core (TC), and whole tumor (WT). Teams were ranked using a cumulative scoring system that considered both segmentation performance, measured by Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and communication efficiency assessed through the convergence score. A PID-controller-based method achieved the top overall ranking, obtaining mean DSC values of 0.733, 0.761, and 0.751 for ET, TC, and WT, respectively, with corresponding HD95 values of 33.922 mm, 33.623 mm, and 32.309 mm, while also demonstrating the highest communication efficiency with a convergence score of 0.764. These findings advance the state of federated learning for medical imaging, surpassing top-performing methods from previous challenge iterations and highlighting PID controllers as effective mechanisms for stabilizing and optimizing weight aggregation in FL. The challenge code is available at https://github.com/FeTS-AI/Challenge.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develops efficient federated learning methods for glioma segmentation
Evaluates robust weight aggregation to improve multi-institutional MRI analysis
Enhances communication efficiency and segmentation accuracy in federated settings
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

PID-controller-based method for federated weight aggregation
Multi-institutional dataset with 1,251 training cases for glioma segmentation
Cumulative scoring system evaluating segmentation performance and communication efficiency
Akis Linardos
Akis Linardos
Indiana University
Responsible AIFederated LearningBiomedical AIPrivacy-preserving AI
Sarthak Pati
Sarthak Pati
MLCommons
Machine LearningDeep LearningFederated LearningRadiomicsImage Processing
U
Ujjwal Baid
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
B
Brandon Edwards
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA
P
Patrick Foley
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Kevin Ta
Kevin Ta
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA
V
Verena Chung
Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, USA
M
Micah Sheller
Medical AI Group, MLCommons, San Francisco, CA, USA
M
Muhammad Irfan Khan
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
M
Mojtaba Jafaritadi
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
E
Elina Kontio
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
S
Suleiman Khan
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
L
Leon Mächler
Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
Ivan Ezhov
Ivan Ezhov
Technical University of Munich
Medical image computingPhysics-informed deep learningInverse modellingComputational oncology
Suprosanna Shit
Suprosanna Shit
University of Zurich | ETH AI Center
Machine LearningMedical ImagingComputer VisionSignal Processing
Johannes C. Paetzold
Johannes C. Paetzold
Cornell University, Weill Cornell Medicine
Machine LearningGeometric Deep LearningGenerative ModelsBiomedical Image Analysis
G
Gustav Grimberg
Ezri AI Labs, Paris, France
M
Manuel A. Nickel
Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
D
David Naccache
Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
V
Vasilis Siomos
City St George’s, University of London, UK
Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
Imperial College London, Flashbots
Privacy Enhancing TechnologiesFederated LearningAI & PrivacyPrivacy-Preserving Machine
Giacomo Tarroni
Giacomo Tarroni
Senior Lecturer in AI, City University of London; Research Fellow, Imperial College London
Computer VisionMedical Image AnalysisSegmentationCardiac MRIMachine Learning
D
Daewoon Kim
Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
L
Leonard L. Klausmann
Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule (OTH) Regensburg, Germany
P
Prashant Shah
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA