π€ AI Summary
Existing neural rendering methods are predominantly evaluated based on image visual quality, often overlooking geometric surface accuracyβa critical requirement for applications such as robotic grasping. To address this gap, this work proposes the first systematic evaluation framework specifically designed to assess the geometric fidelity of neural rendering techniques. Leveraging mainstream approaches including NeRF and Gaussian Splatting, the study evaluates surface and shape accuracy across 19 diverse 3D scenes using established geometric reconstruction metrics. By establishing a reproducible benchmark for geometric precision, this framework complements conventional visual-quality assessments and provides a reliable foundation for selecting and optimizing neural rendering methods in high-accuracy applications.
π Abstract
Recent advances in neural rendering have introduced numerous 3D scene representations. Although standard computer vision metrics evaluate the visual quality of generated images, they often overlook the fidelity of surface geometry. This limitation is particularly critical in robotics, where accurate geometry is essential for tasks such as grasping and object manipulation. In this paper, we present an evaluation pipeline for neural rendering methods that focuses on geometric accuracy, along with a benchmark comprising 19 diverse scenes. Our approach enables a systematic assessment of reconstruction methods in terms of surface and shape fidelity, complementing traditional visual metrics.